Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Making an ali gear lever gate?
fha772

posted on 14/8/10 at 12:01 PM Reply With Quote
Making an ali gear lever gate?

Has anyone on here made an ali gear lever gate, instead of using a gaiter?

Would it pass the IVA if i did make 1?

I was thinking of taking my time measuring and then cut the gate into the top trans tunnel panel, so it was all 1 piece.

What do you think?

Cheers Frank.






http://www.ppcmag.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=6743&start=105

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
robocog

posted on 14/8/10 at 12:13 PM Reply With Quote
Yup Smudge88 (Grant) on here has done it
He's currently somewhere warm and sunning himself at the moment but found this in his photo archive

Dash area
Dash area


Note the groovy lock mech as well so it can be locked into or out of reverse!

Needed a bit of fettling for radiuses but passed SVA at S/Hampton (notoriously strict centre)

Regards
Rob

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
MakeEverything

posted on 14/8/10 at 12:14 PM Reply With Quote
Not sure it would pass a radius test because of the gates?

Nice idea, and i thought i might do one later, with some sort of stretchable fabric (tights or Lycra) underneath so that you cant see through the gate into the tunnel. This way, if i drop anything in there, it wont fall into the tunnel. Likewise vice-versa.





Kindest Regards,
Richard.

...You can make it foolProof, but youll never make it Idiot Proof!...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
fha772

posted on 14/8/10 at 12:26 PM Reply With Quote
That looks great.

So, i might be better off making a gate that would replace the gaiter after IVA?






http://www.ppcmag.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=6743&start=105

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
RazMan

posted on 14/8/10 at 12:34 PM Reply With Quote
Interesting idea but wouldn't it make the gear changes slower and 'notchy'?

For example changing from second to third would require 3 separate movements rather than a diagonal shove on the gearstick.

[Edited on 14-8-10 by RazMan]





Cheers,
Raz

When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
MakeEverything

posted on 14/8/10 at 12:54 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by RazMan
Interesting idea but wouldn't it make the gear changes slower and 'notchy'?

For example changing from second to third would require 3 separate movements rather than a diagonal shove on the gearstick.

[Edited on 14-8-10 by RazMan]



Thats a good point..... maybe i wont then,....





Kindest Regards,
Richard.

...You can make it foolProof, but youll never make it Idiot Proof!...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
fha772

posted on 14/8/10 at 01:20 PM Reply With Quote
With the corners radiused(is that right?), you should get the gears nice and easy, the slots should follow the path that the stick takes, if anything the slots should taper a bit, to make changes slicker.

If done right it shouldn't effect the change at all, if anything it should aid gear change, by stopping the chances of grabbing the wrong gear coming out of a corner. That was the basic principle of a gate when they first started to appear on racing cars in the 50's.

Also, i do like the look of them in a sports car.






http://www.ppcmag.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=6743&start=105

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mcerd1

posted on 14/8/10 at 01:37 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by RazMan
Interesting idea but wouldn't it make the gear changes slower and 'notchy'?

For example changing from second to third would require 3 separate movements rather than a diagonal shove on the gearstick.

[Edited on 14-8-10 by RazMan]


depends how close a fit you make it....





-

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Marcus

posted on 14/8/10 at 02:33 PM Reply With Quote
I got used to mine very quickly, passed SVA ok, so would assume IVA would be ok too.


Description
Description


Reverse is quite heavily sprung, so accidents don't happen

Oh and it hides the remote assembly nicely

[Edited on 14/8/10 by Marcus]





Marcus


Because kits are for girls!!

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Humbug

posted on 14/8/10 at 07:34 PM Reply With Quote
I quite fancy the idea, but how did you (the ones who've done it!) measure up accurately to get the slots lined up for each gear?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Marcus

posted on 15/8/10 at 09:50 AM Reply With Quote
Cardboard is your friend, as always





Marcus


Because kits are for girls!!

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Michael

posted on 15/8/10 at 08:25 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Humbug
I quite fancy the idea, but how did you (the ones who've done it!) measure up accurately to get the slots lined up for each gear?


I was looking at doing the same for my 4 speed box.

Went through all gears marking it out on the tansmission tunnel top, then made a paper template, but turns out the gap between the gears was about 2 or 3 mm so would bend out the way.

In the end i turned a ali plate into a ring and now that is what surrounds my gear leverl.

Also underneath the tunnel is bolted a reverse gate (clapper board principle)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.