The numbers in this link may give you a clue...
PocketGPSWorld
Depressing, isn't it...
us??
jeezo...youve got to wander why they feel the need for so many...
So th USA use what?
USA doesn't seem to have much in the way of cameras, but then maybe the ubiquitous hand held laser devices don;t count as cameras?
Whatever, I suspect those numbers are wildly inaccurate
John
I don't think it's depressing at all.
We have the lowest road fatality rate of all the top 10 most motorised countries.
Maybe no connection maybe there is.
500 children killed in the world every day in road accidents
1.2 million killed in road accidents per annum worldwide....
Now that's depressing.
quote:
Originally posted by mr henderson
Whatever, I suspect those numbers are wildly inaccurate
USA and Canada, Police vehicle mounted radar and lazer. Province of Ontario used cameras mounted in unmarked vans some years ago, but were removed after citizen complaints.
quote:
Originally posted by David Jenkins
The numbers in this link may give you a clue...
PocketGPSWorld
Depressing, isn't it...
much more in france!!
i've had a few trouble free miles in uk now,a lot of cam but never received anything.
start with 12 points on driving licence, remain 2 now...cam spread like a plague on french roads.
quote:
Originally posted by oldtimer
We have the lowest road fatality rate of all the top 10 most motorised countries.
quote:
Originally posted by Canada EH!
USA and Canada, Police vehicle mounted radar and lazer. Province of Ontario used cameras mounted in unmarked vans some years ago, but were removed after citizen complaints.
It is definately true that we have a better-than-most record on our roads statisticly.
The number of pedestrian deaths per annum continues to fall annualy, only a 1% fall these days, but very significant if you are in that 1%.
We still need to be forced to slow down, 21% of road deaths in the UK were still those of pedestrians.
One little known statistic is that at in urban 20 mph zones, of pedestrians hit at 20mph, only 2.5% end in the death of a pedestrian.
I am not saying that it is all due to speed cameras at all. But, the statistics are going in the right direction.
I know very well that the arguement is that trainig is the way to resolve this. But, sadly we can't stop some ignoring their training like we
can't stop people ignoring the speed limits.
It is definately true that we have a better-than-most record on our roads statisticly.
The number of pedestrian deaths per annum continues to fall annualy, only a 1% fall these days, but very significant if you are in that 1%.
We still need to be forced to slow down, 21% of road deaths in the UK were still those of pedestrians.
One little known statistic is that at in urban 20 mph zones, of pedestrians hit at 20mph, only 2.5% end in the death of a pedestrian.
I am not saying that it is all due to speed cameras at all. But, the statistics are going in the right direction.
I know very well that the arguement is that trainig is the way to resolve this. But, sadly we can't stop some ignoring their training like we
can't stop people ignoring the speed limits.
Seems OK to me.
If the treasury wasn't generating that income from 'taxing' speeders, they would probably be raising the taxes that I have no control
over whether I pay or not.
quote:
Originally posted by oldtimer
It is definately true that we have a better-than-most record on our roads statisticly.
The number of pedestrian deaths per annum continues to fall annualy, only a 1% fall these days, but very significant if you are in that 1%.
We still need to be forced to slow down, 21% of road deaths in the UK were still those of pedestrians.
One little known statistic is that at in urban 20 mph zones, of pedestrians hit at 20mph, only 2.5% end in the death of a pedestrian.
I am not saying that it is all due to speed cameras at all. But, the statistics are going in the right direction.
I know very well that the argument is that trainig is the way to resolve this. But, sadly we can't stop some ignoring their training like we can't stop people ignoring the speed limits.
^^ quite agree.
They had cameras in British Columbia a few years ago, and they took them off the road. Not because of complaints, but because they made so many mistakes (people got tickets in the mail when they weren't even on the road that day!) that they didn't make any money.
quote:
Originally posted by carpmart
quote:
Originally posted by oldtimer
We still need to be forced to slow down, 21% of road deaths in the UK were still those of pedestrians.
What you have said in your post, whilst factual is looking at a very small percentage of the statistics. Speed camera's have a place and in certain conditions do slow down traffic which has had and can have, a positive effect in certain circumstances. However, they have been completely overused by a massive factor. This diminishes their effectiveness in the areas where they would have had a positive impact.
Bad driving, bad driving habits and poor eduction are what causes accidents. We teach new drivers to follow the highway code but we don't teach them how to enter and exit fast moving traffic when joining a motorway. We don't teach them that old people need a wide berth and can be as unpredictable as young drivers. We don't teach them lane discipline. We don't teach them how to multitask and continually look at their speedo and know to within feet what the speed limit is in certain areas and still remain a safe driver observing what is happening around them.
Road deaths are going down, not because of the use of speed cameras reducing accidents, more that cars are safer for the occupants and pedestrians.
Here in Holland we have around 1700 speed camera's. Excl. mobile camera's etc...