Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Metal Experts: Q. Which would be stronger?
andyd

posted on 28/7/09 at 03:47 PM Reply With Quote
Metal Experts: Q. Which would be stronger?

For making suspension bush tubes (plus the top link tube).

Option A:
Get bar stock of whatever diameter, turn it down to required dim, drill out the middle to get required wall thickness.

Option B:
Use seamless tube of whatever diameter with a wall thickness of required.

Would there be any strength difference between the two options?





Andy

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 28/7/09 at 03:53 PM Reply With Quote
No appreciable difference. Only time and cost.

Infact most people use normal ERW tube and align the weld line with where the suspension tubes are welded on.

David





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
shaun fulcrum

posted on 28/7/09 at 03:57 PM Reply With Quote
Not an expert, but I would say tube of correct size. Un-machined metal seams to have a "skin" on it.

My 2p, ready to be proved wrong

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
omega 24 v6

posted on 28/7/09 at 04:03 PM Reply With Quote
Well IMHO and from my 25 year ago apprenticeship/hnc I'd say the following.

Seamless drawn tube would have the grain structure of the material running in the correct direction ( Similar to a forging if you like)
Whereas a solid bar machined would have the grain structure cut through and therefore technically weakened.

But in reality either will be more than sufficient for the job





If it looks wrong it probably is wrong.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Wadders

posted on 28/7/09 at 05:49 PM Reply With Quote
unless you have access to a cnc lathe, or your some kind of masochist, go with tube.

It would be difficult to simply drill the centre out of bar stock of that diameter and leave a thin wall, you would need to use a boring bar, which is painfully slow on a normal lathe.

Al.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
andyd

posted on 28/7/09 at 05:59 PM Reply With Quote
Cheers chaps.

I was thinking bar stock would be cheaper than seamless tube but now I've looked into it I'm way off the mark.

Although having said that, metals4u don't actually list a seamless tube variant but on the basis the ERW stuff is way cheaper than bar I'll assume even seamless would be much cheaper too.

Anyone got an online source for seamless? My local IS&G are bound to be *the* most expensive place you've ever found although I've not actually asked them yet.

Edit to say: If I looked harder I'd find metals4u *do* list CDS tubing.

[Edited on 28/7/2009 by andyd]





Andy

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 28/7/09 at 06:04 PM Reply With Quote
Cold drawn tubes have grains aligned with the axis of the tube making them stronger in tension and compression in that axis but weaker in the other axis.
Cold drawing also has the beneficial effect of incresing the elastic limmit but not the ultimate tensile stress.

In any event suspension bush tubes aren't heavily loaded so strength dosen't come into it so ERW with the seam machined off will do the job nicely.





[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
andyd

posted on 28/7/09 at 06:09 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
In any event suspension bush tubes aren't heavily loaded so strength dosen't come into it so ERW with the seam machined off will do the job nicely.

Excellent.

Thanks all for the replies. The wealth of knowledge via this forum is top banana.





Andy

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.