Board logo

And heres me thinking I wouldn't become a Kitcar snob
TPG - 13/5/05 at 07:28 PM

'Kin 'ell.........!!!!!At least it is stated as bad points


flak monkey - 13/5/05 at 07:36 PM

I saw that yesterday while trawling through ebay...looks a bit weird IMO. But its different


Northy - 13/5/05 at 07:55 PM

Not my cup of tea!


Mr G - 13/5/05 at 08:39 PM

The first seven i've ever seen with side skirts


Edit : On second thoughts thats probably the chassis

[Edited on 13/5/05 by Mr G]


Peteff - 13/5/05 at 09:37 PM

What's the odds it's still registered as a 1975 Spitfire? Have you seen the message where the bloke offers him £500 for it if it doesn't make reserve .


stevebubs - 13/5/05 at 09:41 PM

As it's using the Spitfire Chassis then I don't think there's actually anything wrong with that.....doesn't have to go through SVA or anything...

quote:
Originally posted by Peteff
What's the odds it's still registered as a 1975 Spitfire? Have you seen the message where the bloke offers him £500 for it if it doesn't make reserve .


Danozeman - 14/5/05 at 09:39 AM

The side skirts are its best feature.


DEAN C. - 14/5/05 at 02:28 PM

Think i'd prefer the rusty spitfire!
It must be one of the only kits that devalues by building it,a tatty spitfire would probably be worth more.


Kissy - 16/5/05 at 06:40 AM

I've asked to go and see it. It's 10 miles away and I wouldn't miss this.


ChrisGamlin - 16/5/05 at 08:54 AM

No offence but don't waste the poor chap's time if you've got no intention of buying the thing. Its certainly not my cup-of-tea either but Im sure if we were selling our cars, we'd all be pretty annoyed if say a Caterham owner took up some of our time looking at our cars just to snigger at them for not being as good as a Caterham.