austin man
|
posted on 12/10/09 at 09:53 PM |
|
|
any one on here
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/MK-Indy-damaged-not-locost-caterham-robin-hood_W0QQitemZ300356446830QQcmdZViewItemQQptZAutomobiles_UK?hash=item45eea3aa6e&_t
rksid=p3286.c0.m14
Seen this on the bay of E anyone on this forum
Life is like a bowl of fruit, funny how all the weird looking ones are left alone
|
|
|
Mark G
|
posted on 12/10/09 at 10:16 PM |
|
|
Being a little naughty using the chassis number and engine number. I assume a rebuild using a new chassis is on the cards.
|
|
austin man
|
posted on 12/10/09 at 10:23 PM |
|
|
reckon so probably bought back from the insurance company
Life is like a bowl of fruit, funny how all the weird looking ones are left alone
|
|
Chippy
|
posted on 12/10/09 at 10:25 PM |
|
|
I would say using the chassis number is OK. If you re-body a car useing a new body then it is classed as a rebuild so no IVA, so using a new chassis
would class as the same, or at least thats how I see it. Cheers Ray
To make a car go faster, just add lightness. Colin Chapman - OR - fit a bigger engine. Chippy
|
|
austin man
|
posted on 12/10/09 at 10:30 PM |
|
|
Im not really bothered about what they are looking to do with the chasis number. may be interested in it as a project. Just wondered whether it
belongs to anyone on here
Life is like a bowl of fruit, funny how all the weird looking ones are left alone
|
|
coozer
|
posted on 13/10/09 at 09:52 AM |
|
|
If you buy it and it still has the chassis number on it you are legally entitled to apply for the V5. If he's ground it off he's breaking
the law.
If he has used the chassis number on another chassis then he is guilty of ringing.
Go buy it then on collection tell him you will be apply for the V5 and the cops will be on the way to see him.
1972 V8 Jago
1980 Z750
|
|
neilj37
|
posted on 13/10/09 at 05:35 PM |
|
|
In my opinion it looks like he is going to get a new kit and use the chassis number and engine from this on his new one so he can bypass IVA. Naughty
naughty.
|
|
austin man
|
posted on 13/10/09 at 10:26 PM |
|
|
not really naughty, if you weny via insurance they would reshell a car if required so whats the difference. I wouldnt class it as ringing. Looks like
I opened a can of worms here
Life is like a bowl of fruit, funny how all the weird looking ones are left alone
|
|
Steve Hignett
|
posted on 13/10/09 at 10:34 PM |
|
|
If he hadn't of answered his question honestly or posted the response, then no-one would of known he was up to anything dodgy!!!
It could of been a "track car" that he was selling...
|
|
40inches
|
posted on 15/10/09 at 08:10 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by neilj37
In my opinion it looks like he is going to get a new kit and use the chassis number and engine from this on his new one so he can bypass IVA. Naughty
naughty.
Possibly, but who on here wouldn't do exactly the same thing?
I sure as hell would
|
|
Peteff
|
posted on 15/10/09 at 08:32 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mark G
Being a little naughty using the chassis number and engine number. I assume a rebuild using a new chassis is on the cards.
No problem using the original identity if he's putting the same engine in the same make chassis as far as the law is concerned.
yours, Pete
I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.
|
|
flak monkey
|
posted on 15/10/09 at 08:42 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Peteff
quote: Originally posted by Mark G
Being a little naughty using the chassis number and engine number. I assume a rebuild using a new chassis is on the cards.
No problem using the original identity if he's putting the same engine in the same make chassis as far as the law is concerned.
Quite right.
If you rebuild an MGB or similar you can replace the whole shell with a new one and retain all the original docs and numbers.
Its not actually a problem as long as everything is replaced like for like and all the same running gear is transferred to the new chassis too.
The problem comes when someone buys a dutton and then uses the numbers to build an mk/gts/mnr etc.
Sera
http://www.motosera.com
|
|
JoelP
|
posted on 16/10/09 at 08:07 PM |
|
|
Im unsure on this one myself. Think it sounds worse than it is due to having so many little grey areas rolled together - but no individual step is
illegal, so it must be legal overall.
Theres nothing to say he cannot remove the chassis, de-ID it and sell it on as a lump of metal. Thats not ringing.
Building a new one with the engine and numbers of the old one sounds dodgy but again isnt really, as said several times above you can rebuild with a
new chassis; it just happens he's also swapping everything else at the same time.
|
|