Andy S
|
posted on 9/9/13 at 05:46 PM |
|
|
Dutton project on Ebay
ETDWM
Early Dutton B Type chassis, bodywork and the V5c
auction
£500 ONO removes it.
will also be listing
Alfa 1300 Twink - tuned and rebuilt before storage for the last decade
Alfa 2000 Twinspark with the crank for spigot bearing so conversion to RWD - low mileage good engine
Alfa 2000 Twink in bits - lots of bits
3 off 5 speed box's
2 live Alfa 105 series axles
Other classic bits a pieces.
Andrew
|
|
|
jossey
|
posted on 9/9/13 at 06:55 PM |
|
|
That's cheap for a reg plate to put on another car lol
Thanks
David Johnson
Building my tiger avon slowly but surely.
|
|
loggyboy
|
posted on 9/9/13 at 07:01 PM |
|
|
Coming soon.... to an MK near you!
Mistral Motorsport
|
|
Andy S
|
posted on 9/9/13 at 08:07 PM |
|
|
Sadly it is unlikely that it will ever be a Dutton again but I can only hope that its used in a honest manner but already had a couple of docs only PM
request through this site !
Strangely they attempt to drag you into an illegal undertaking and and offer you less than the asking price ! LOL
|
|
slingshot2000
|
posted on 9/9/13 at 09:24 PM |
|
|
Is there any reason that this chassis could not be altered to accept an IRS and Locost/Haynes front suspension without needing to be IVA'ed?
Using regular photographs and a blog to show complete and continued use of the majority of the existing chassis?
Just an idea brewing . . . . . . .
Regards
Jon
|
|
mookaloid
|
posted on 9/9/13 at 09:28 PM |
|
|
I think it would be cool to keep it as a Dutton
"That thing you're thinking - it wont be that."
|
|
iank
|
posted on 9/9/13 at 09:37 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by slingshot2000
Is there any reason that this chassis could not be altered to accept an IRS and Locost/Haynes front suspension without needing to be IVA'ed?
Using regular photographs and a blog to show complete and continued use of the majority of the existing chassis?
Just an idea brewing . . . . . . .
Regards
Jon
You can't alter the chassis at all without needing an IVA - as a number of Range Rover based special builders have found to their cost.
--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous
|
|
owelly
|
posted on 9/9/13 at 09:46 PM |
|
|
I recently had a discussion with a fellow kit car owner who was selling his 'correctly registered' 1968 reg'd car with historic tax.
I questioned how it could be historic when the kit wasn't produced until 1983. To prove his point he wrote to DVLA for confirmation. He no
longer has historic status on his V5!
http://www.ppcmag.co.uk
|
|
slingshot2000
|
posted on 9/9/13 at 09:49 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by mookaloid
I think it would be cool to keep it as a Dutton
Yes, exactly that; but with more modern bits underneath it.
Regards
Jon
|
|
Andy S
|
posted on 9/9/13 at 10:18 PM |
|
|
Plenty of Duttons out there with modifications to improve the safety of the car around the original chassis - one I did a while ago
And that one was correctly registered with the DVLA as a FORD Coupe - I applied for the V55 info and it provided all of the correct submittal forms
from the applicant and the scribbles and hash up from the DVLA processing clerk in 1977 getting it all wrong. Some things never change...
quote: Originally posted by slingshot2000
quote: Originally posted by mookaloid
I think it would be cool to keep it as a Dutton
Yes, exactly that; but with more modern bits underneath it.
Regards
Jon
|
|
mookaloid
|
posted on 9/9/13 at 11:57 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by slingshot2000
quote: Originally posted by mookaloid
I think it would be cool to keep it as a Dutton
Yes, exactly that; but with more modern bits underneath it.
Regards
Jon
Yes indeed
"That thing you're thinking - it wont be that."
|
|
alfas
|
posted on 12/9/13 at 04:35 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by slingshot2000
Is there any reason that this chassis could not be altered to accept an IRS and Locost/Haynes front suspension without needing to be IVA'ed?
Using regular photographs and a blog to show complete and continued use of the majority of the existing chassis?
Just an idea brewing . . . . . . .
Regards
Jon
already been done here:
MK Inspired Kit Car
|
|
slingshot2000
|
posted on 12/9/13 at 07:25 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by alfas
quote: Originally posted by slingshot2000
Is there any reason that this chassis could not be altered to accept an IRS and Locost/Haynes front suspension without needing to be IVA'ed?
Using regular photographs and a blog to show complete and continued use of the majority of the existing chassis?
Just an idea brewing . . . . . . .
Regards
Jon
already been done here:
MK Inspired Kit Car
There has been another thread running regarding that ""Dutton"";
http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=185032
I don't think that there is very much "Dutton" in that car whatsoever, maybe just the VIN tag ! !
The seller deleted questions, it was reported to eBay and eventually the seller pulled the ad !
Regards
Jon
|
|
alfas
|
posted on 12/9/13 at 08:09 AM |
|
|
the seller insisted being a dutton and even argued with me when i asked him that its pressumeably a MK indy which has been put on the road, avoiding
IVA, using a dutton v5c.
"I bought and adapted a Dutton chassis in good faith ensuring I have worked well within the law which is more than most kit car builders do.
"
"I could send you pictures of the chassis, I could send you picturers of the chassis when I bought it, I could show you picturers of the
modifications as I made them, I could show you picturers of the chassis plates and the numbers stamped into to the chassis. Parting with this car
after having put so much time effort and money into it is difficult enough as it is, so please I urge you to spend your time on more constructive
pursuits and not to contact me again."
|
|
slingshot2000
|
posted on 12/9/13 at 08:13 AM |
|
|
He was very unlikely to admit to what is essentially an illegal act now, was he?
I asked what model Dutton it was based on and he could not even answer that simple question.
Regards
Jon
|
|
matt_gsxr
|
posted on 12/9/13 at 09:10 AM |
|
|
What about this then.
If all those car that are incorrectly registered as Duttons are being found out.
Perhaps there is now a market for brand a new Dutton chassis, so that people reuse these V5's properly. Isn't there a caveat that allows
you to replace the chassis with an identical version and retain the V5.
Its a wierd world.
|
|