Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Typical height
b14wrc

posted on 14/7/12 at 07:00 PM Reply With Quote
Typical height

Hi Guys,

This afternoon I have been messing around with my mock up chassis and my new build table. Tried wheels up against the frame and wondered typically what should the ride height be?

What sort of distance from the ground to the lower chassis rails should I be aiming for??

Regards, Rob

[Edited on 14/7/12 by b14wrc]





20vt powered rear engined locost

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
tomgregory2000

posted on 14/7/12 at 07:58 PM Reply With Quote
75-100mm tends to be the norm
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 14/7/12 at 08:13 PM Reply With Quote
Mine sits at 3" front, 3.5" rear, only goes on the track.

On the road I think I had 4" front 4.5" rear.

To set up cut up a couple of blocks of wood to just slide under, tape measures are hard work !

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
kb58

posted on 14/7/12 at 09:22 PM Reply With Quote
What do you plan to drive over/on? Decent streets only? I agree with 88-100mm minimum. Poor quality streets? 100-125mm min. Track? As low as possible without bottoming.

If you're at the build stage and presumably have already designed the car (or have the plans) there is already a ride height dimension...

[Edited on 7/14/12 by kb58]





Mid-engine Locost - http://www.midlana.com
And the book - http://www.lulu.com/shop/kurt-bilinski/midlana/paperback/product-21330662.html
Kimini - a tube-frame, carbon shell, Honda Prelude VTEC mid-engine Mini: http://www.kimini.com
And its book - http://www.lulu.com/shop/kurt-bilinski/kimini-how-to-design-and-build-a-mid-engine-sports-car-from-scratch/paperback/product-4858803.html

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
b14wrc

posted on 14/7/12 at 09:32 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks for the comments.

Yes I had looked at it in my design work for CoG calculations and had looked at about 150mm originally, but today I was looking at the real life stuff and wondered what others were running. Havnt fully finalised the suspension, going to kind of develope it as I go to be honest, worked out were the pick up points are and derived the front track, rear track is set by the donor cars original track.

Maybe I'm set a little high then. I'm going to run inboard shocks so will easily be able to adjust it.

So lower the better, good good!





20vt powered rear engined locost

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
kb58

posted on 18/7/12 at 01:09 AM Reply With Quote
Sorry, I didn't mean "track" as in distance between the wheels, I meant that if you're going to drive the car on-track, that it needs to be as low as possible, short of bottoming.





Mid-engine Locost - http://www.midlana.com
And the book - http://www.lulu.com/shop/kurt-bilinski/midlana/paperback/product-21330662.html
Kimini - a tube-frame, carbon shell, Honda Prelude VTEC mid-engine Mini: http://www.kimini.com
And its book - http://www.lulu.com/shop/kurt-bilinski/kimini-how-to-design-and-build-a-mid-engine-sports-car-from-scratch/paperback/product-4858803.html

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
froggy

posted on 20/7/12 at 05:33 PM Reply With Quote
110mm front and rear on mine but i can come down a bit for trackdays , sump is 12mm below chassis





[IMG]http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r187/froggy_0[IMG]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
coyoteboy

posted on 20/7/12 at 06:14 PM Reply With Quote
None of you worried that you're dramatically altering the suspension curves by operating with ~50mm lower ride height dialed in?
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
froggy

posted on 20/7/12 at 06:26 PM Reply With Quote
When I went from 13-15" wheels I had to make some fairly large changes to the suspension pickups to get the wishbone angles where they should be and move the shock mounts to get the travel right . On the road I think 100mm is as low as I would go .,





[IMG]http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r187/froggy_0[IMG]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
coyoteboy

posted on 20/7/12 at 06:30 PM Reply With Quote
Indeed I intend to run 100 on the road, I think lower would end up with too many ground strikes on the UKs roads.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
froggy

posted on 20/7/12 at 08:13 PM Reply With Quote
When I went from 13-15" wheels I had to make some fairly large changes to the suspension pickups to get the wishbone angles where they should be and move the shock mounts to get the travel right . On the road I think 100mm is as low as I would go .,





[IMG]http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r187/froggy_0[IMG]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.