locoboy
|
| posted on 10/6/07 at 07:08 PM |
|
|
Why would you ???
its wrong!
ATB
Locoboy
|
|
|
|
|
Simon
|
| posted on 10/6/07 at 07:12 PM |
|
|
Why not
ATB
Simon
|
|
|
oadamo
|
| posted on 10/6/07 at 07:13 PM |
|
|
check out the back box pmsl
|
|
|
speedyxjs
|
| posted on 10/6/07 at 07:19 PM |
|
|
I'd be too afraid that it might roll over when going round a corner 
How long can i resist the temptation to drop a V8 in?
|
|
|
Humbug
|
| posted on 10/6/07 at 08:02 PM |
|
|
If he really must do that, it needs wheels at least twice the diameter 
|
|
|
RazMan
|
| posted on 10/6/07 at 08:37 PM |
|
|
quote "It is one of a kind vehicle and drives as good as it looks"
So that means it handles like a pot bellied pig on laxatives then
Cheers,
Raz
When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box
|
|
|
Confused but excited.
|
| posted on 10/6/07 at 08:37 PM |
|
|
"Drives as good as it looks"
Christ I hope not! 
Tell them about the bent treacle edges!
|
|
|
ayoungman
|
| posted on 10/6/07 at 09:15 PM |
|
|
I'm a series 3 landrover owner for 10 years. The first vehicle I ever rode in was a landrover. I'll be taken to the grave in a landrover.
I would never create an abonination like that though. It may be good off road but ye gods, it looks damn ugly
"just like that !"
|
|
|
mark chandler
|
| posted on 10/6/07 at 09:56 PM |
|
|
Its a bit fugly, but why not indeed.
Loads of 200tdi Disco's are now scrap due to body rot, no-one really complains if you saw the back off a rangerover and bob tail it, at least
this maintains a decent body.
Approach and depart angles are good, reasonable wheel base, should be fine.
|
|
|
myeates
|
| posted on 10/6/07 at 10:11 PM |
|
|
cos he could, but with out thinking about it first, really does need bigger wheels, or different car
|
|
|
