Board logo

locost telephoto lens
02GF74 - 2/6/08 at 08:50 AM

Why spend £ 3 K on a fancy Canon lens when you can use a pair of £ 30 binoculars!!

ok, not the most brilliant of photos but was surprised how well it came out. Rescued attachment tp.jpg
Rescued attachment tp.jpg

mookaloid - 2/6/08 at 08:52 AM

Err what is it?

indykid - 2/6/08 at 08:55 AM

is it a cat? do i win a prize?

tom

omega0684 - 2/6/08 at 09:05 AM

ITS CHEWBACKA! You can even see the spaceship in the back ground

indykid - 2/6/08 at 09:11 AM

i thought it might be that damn sasquatch, but i'd not considered chewbacka when i suggested a cat!

tom

viatron - 2/6/08 at 09:20 AM

its an Ewok of course!

[Edited on 2-6-2008 by viatron]

mistergrumpy - 2/6/08 at 09:23 AM

Is it Locoboy? See I can see his hand bandaged up

Hellfire - 2/6/08 at 09:40 AM

quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74
Why spend £ 3 K on a fancy Canon lens when you can use a pair of £ 30 binoculars!!


Using a Pin-hole camera (i.e. Matchbox with a pin-hole in the centre and 35mm film opposite the hole) and a pair of binoculars to take pictures is generally not going to get you top quality pictures. Oh - and another thing... your photo is crap - thats why!

Steve

[Edited on 2-6-08 by Hellfire]

balidey - 2/6/08 at 10:45 AM

quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74
Why spend £ 3 K on a fancy Canon lens when you can use a pair of £ 30 binoculars!!



Didn't we already discuss this? Save yourself £30 and just stand closer to what you want to take a picture of.

chockymonster - 2/6/08 at 11:46 AM

Mmmm, canon zoom lenses
My wallet hurts now

p.s. taken with a camera phone hence the poor quality

[Edited on 2/6/08 by chockymonster] Rescued attachment IMAGE_031.jpg
Rescued attachment IMAGE_031.jpg

Mix - 2/6/08 at 03:32 PM

Hi

From my point of view you have answered your own question

Mick

James - 2/6/08 at 05:05 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Mix
Hi

From my point of view you have answered your own question

Mick


lol!