simon h
|
| posted on 10/4/17 at 10:19 AM |
|
|
He did, for £1500 more than it was with the Lotus engine in.
Is this a TRADE ADVERTISEMENT?? Click HERE to report it!
|
|
|
|
|
mikele
|
| posted on 10/4/17 at 10:45 AM |
|
|
I was going to buy this but didn't because of the cat c, bit naughty to buy it cheap because of it then not mention it when you sell it on for
more..
|
|
|
alfas
|
| posted on 10/4/17 at 12:16 PM |
|
|
anyhow....can anybody tell for how much it was sold??
|
|
|
jeffw
|
| posted on 10/4/17 at 12:23 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by mikele
I was going to buy this but didn't because of the cat c, bit naughty to buy it cheap because of it then not mention it when you sell it on for
more..
It is a kitcar, what difference does the Cat C make?
|
|
|
sam919
|
| posted on 10/4/17 at 01:18 PM |
|
|
If it's right it's right? Cat C and a new chassis? Great, a newer car than what it was!
|
|
|
jeffw
|
| posted on 10/4/17 at 01:56 PM |
|
|
Indeed...
|
|
|
rdodger
|
| posted on 16/4/17 at 02:10 PM |
|
|
Now on ebay at £10,250
FISHER FURY SPRINT AND HILLCLIMB CAR. ROAD REGISTERED RACE CAR!
|
|
|
mikele
|
| posted on 16/4/17 at 06:03 PM |
|
|
It wasn't clear what happend in its past. But it's not a new chassis,it was repaired.
And a cat c is always worth less regardless of what's happend.
I'd rather buy one that's not , that's all.
[Edited on 16/4/17 by mikele]
|
|
|
mark chandler
|
| posted on 16/4/17 at 06:25 PM |
|
|
If he is able to buy cheap and happy to sell expensive what's wrong with that provided he informs the buyer of the history. It's called
dealing!
|
|
|
simon h
|
| posted on 16/4/17 at 07:52 PM |
|
|
Nothing if he is a dealer, acting like a dealer. No doubt when if something goes wrong it will be a private sale, sorry cant help you.
|
|
|
alfas
|
| posted on 17/4/17 at 07:12 AM |
|
|
exactly...the ebay account is a private account...so it will be a private-sales.
i got this car offered for 8500 after it was sold from the private seller. so the 8500,-€ offer must have come from the same dealer who is
advertizing it for 10250,- now
if he was willing to sell it for 8500,- he must have bought it for 6500 or so?
so again the question: for how much it was sold?
|
|
|
PorkChop
|
| posted on 17/4/17 at 10:15 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by alfas
exactly...the ebay account is a private account...so it will be a private-sales.
i got this car offered for 8500 after it was sold from the private seller. so the 8500,-€ offer must have come from the same dealer who is
advertizing it for 10250,- now
if he was willing to sell it for 8500,- he must have bought it for 6500 or so?
so again the question: for how much it was sold?
If it bothers you that much, ask (either) seller directly.
Although, is it really any of your business to know?
|
|
|
alfas
|
| posted on 17/4/17 at 11:20 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by PorkChop
quote:
Originally posted by alfas
exactly...the ebay account is a private account...so it will be a private-sales.
i got this car offered for 8500 after it was sold from the private seller. so the 8500,-€ offer must have come from the same dealer who is
advertizing it for 10250,- now
if he was willing to sell it for 8500,- he must have bought it for 6500 or so?
so again the question: for how much it was sold?
If it bothers you that much, ask (either) seller directly.
Although, is it really any of your business to know?
i asked the seller...but he never replied.
i dont mind if somebody is "dealing" with things...but in such a rather small community like the kitcar-scene its not "honest"
purchasing the car under the cloak of a "private" buyer / collector and than re-advertizing the car 1 week later for a much higher
price.
there might be another reason why the original seller has not answered about his sales price:
the car was declared officially as "sold", even it isnt: because the dealer made the original seller the offer to share the extra profit.
|
|
|
PorkChop
|
| posted on 17/4/17 at 12:13 PM |
|
|
You have your answer then - with the best will in the world you are not going to know.
I'm not saying that a trader posing as a private seller isn't dishonest and unless you have evidence contrary to it then the original
seller has to be given the benefit of the doubt.
I will say this though; If you asked me how much I sold (or bought) something for, and the transaction was nothing to do with you; I wouldn't
bank on you getting an answer to your question!
|
|
|
