Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: eninge mounts mk III
02GF74

posted on 24/3/09 at 09:32 AM Reply With Quote
eninge mounts mk III

.... or do away with the recently pruchased engine mounts and fit land rover ones, like these.

then make a box at 45 degree from the top to the engine, much in the style of the haynes roadster book?

would that be better option?



^^^ those a series Land Rover moutns - anyone know if the one in photo are fro front or rear of engine, as well as size (diameter/thickness/stud thread)?

taq.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
handyandy

posted on 24/3/09 at 09:35 AM Reply With Quote
i would prefer this method as it would be less stresses on the metal that you would fabricate,
IMO of course, but as i,m building a roadster maybe i,m biased towards this method

andy

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
iank

posted on 24/3/09 at 09:45 AM Reply With Quote
Those mounts are these I think
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Land-Rover-Defender-V8-Engine-Mount-Mounting-Rubbers_W0QQitemZ250376113124

Equivalent to land Rover Part numbers: ANR1808, STC434, NRC9560, NTC5900, RTC6115, ANR2471

The measurements of these mounts are:

Thickness/height: 37mm
Diameter: 77mm
Studs: M10 x 20mm Male both sides

Very cheap!





--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
l0rd

posted on 24/3/09 at 09:51 AM Reply With Quote
Yes they are these one. Exactly the ones I got as well.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
dhutch

posted on 24/3/09 at 01:54 PM Reply With Quote
With the interleaf, you will get less axial deflection too, with limited change in axial shear, which is proberbly a good thing.

(that is about the sum total of my knowlage of mounts gone)

Need a pair myself.


Daniel

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
dhutch

posted on 25/3/09 at 10:36 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by dhutch
With the interleaf, for the same sure hardness of rubber you will get less axial stiffness/deflection, with limited change in axial stiffness/shear, which is proberbly a good thing. (engine bobs up and down less, but can still rotate around CofG in simular way.

- That is about the sum total of my knowlage of mounts gone.

Need a pair myself.


Daniel

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 25/3/09 at 09:29 PM Reply With Quote
I use those mounts too.

Rock solid and cheap as chips





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
owelly

posted on 25/3/09 at 10:07 PM Reply With Quote
Rather strangely, my local factors had the LR engine mounts listed for £8 each but gearbox mountings for £4.50 each. They're exactly the same!!!





http://www.ppcmag.co.uk

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 25/3/09 at 10:28 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by owelly
Rather strangely, my local factors had the LR engine mounts listed for £8 each but gearbox mountings for £4.50 each. They're exactly the same!!!


Which did you buy then ?





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.