A cyclist could concievably cause significant damage to a seven type car. Sooo in the event of a cyclist doing something stupid like driving recklessly or drink cycling and causing damage to your car. What happens insurance wise? Do responsible cyclists have 3rd party insurance?
quote:
Originally posted by liam.mccaffrey
Do responsible cyclists have 3rd party insurance?
Some do have specific third party cycle insurance and I have heard that some home policies include it. Most will be uninsured, so if they're at fault you have to sue them and hope they can afford it!
The day you have to insure a push bike is the day the nation will die. Short of walking everywhere people who cant afford cars will lose just about
all freedom, cycling is still in my opinion the best way to get around especially on a nice day, with the only drawback being you can't really go
more than 15 miles.
I can't think of a single situation where a cyclist could be at fault, its not like they are fast enough to cut you up, and then it is always the
car driver who does that anyway. The difference between the damage a bike can do to a car and the damage a car can do to a cyclist is astronomical.
And all this 'you should have to legally wear a helmet' mumbo jumbo is bollocks, if you took the sh*tty drivers off the road you
wouldn't need to!
When I was crashed into while on my bike, caused by, you guessed it, an uninsured car driver! I got the money for a new bike from the Motor Insurance
Bureau so I assume they would be the people you would have to talk to.
This is a joke right
"I can't think of a single situation where a cyclist could be at fault, its not like they are fast enough to cut you up, and then it is
always the car driver who does that anyway. The difference between the damage a bike can do to a car and the damage a car can do to a cyclist is
astronomical."
The amount of cyclists I have personally seen going through red lights for instance is amazing and that wouldn't be there fault if there was an
accident as a result??
David
I agree with most of what you said to be honest, however I can think of many legitimate situations where a cyclist could be at fault!
I don't think its unreasonable that cyclist could clatter a wing mirror overtaking a string of stationary traffic or scrape down the side of my
shiny new Aston.
quote:
Originally posted by vanepico
The day you have to insure a push bike is the day the nation will die. Short of walking everywhere people who cant afford cars will lose just about all freedom, cycling is still in my opinion the best way to get around especially on a nice day, with the only drawback being you can't really go more than 15 miles.
I can't think of a single situation where a cyclist could be at fault, its not like they are fast enough to cut you up, and then it is always the car driver who does that anyway. The difference between the damage a bike can do to a car and the damage a car can do to a cyclist is astronomical.
And all this 'you should have to legally wear a helmet' mumbo jumbo is bollocks, if you took the sh*tty drivers off the road you wouldn't need to!
When I was crashed into while on my bike, caused by, you guessed it, an uninsured car driver! I got the money for a new bike from the Motor Insurance Bureau so I assume they would be the people you would have to talk to.
Insurance for cyclists would be practically impossible to enforce, it would require registration of all cyclists (day hire cyclists, kids,
registration of every bike, it'd cost more than VED to administer and be a complete waste of time). As a cyclist and a petrolhead I'd
suggest you're better thinking of something else to worry about.
A bike would cause more damage value to a tin-top than a 7, and in either case significantly less damage than a car would. They still are liable for
your damages and you can claim them back from them personally, the reason they don't have to have insurance like a car is it's pretty damn
rare for them to be at fault in an accident, the damage they do can generally be settled in cash and they're the most likely to be personally
injured.
Yes, there are some irresponsible bike owners and users but the vast majority are just as law-abiding as motorists, if not more so.
Each morning on my commute I see one or two red light jumping cyclists and usually the same cyclists being a bit dangerous/breaking a few other
laws.
Each morning I see literally dozens of cars breaking speed limits, not indicating, a few overtaking over double whites, red and orange light
jumping.
Concentrate on the ~20% uninsured car drivers driving around in poorly maintained 1.5 tonne metal boxes, not the fleshy blobs on little metal
triangles weighing in at a total of about 0.1 tonnes and travelling at a max of around 20mph usually.
Quite frankly, as a driver I feel if I can't avoid, overtake or pre-empt a cyclist on the road, I'M the one that shouldn't be driving.
The law as far as Im aware is cyclists do not need compulsory insurance. Im sure there is a compelling reason for that otherwise draconian
legislation would of kicked in yonks ago.
Fact though,Much more damage likely to a cyclist than to a motorist in the event of an accident between the two all things being equal.
Seen it enough times with motorbikes - which of course are light and unstable enough to be easily quite seriously damaged.
Including one case recently where a friend had a camera on - ok he was coming around a van in a junction, but you could see other cyclists waiting at
the red light which the girl with the headphones had ridden through.
Yep, some have seen cases where bikes could cause some damage, no-one argued that, you could feasibly make a few up that you've not seen. The
point is how do you possibly work it? You'd need tests, licenses and registrations and insurances for every man, woman and child. For the sake of
very very few incidents of very very low value, the effort is just not worth it even if it were enforceable.
We have licenses and insurances for driving lethal vehicles on the road where we could harm others. The fact a bike could cause some small financial
damage and possibly a small injury by RLJing does not necessitate developing a whole new insurance racket around such vehicles. Go check the figures
on number and values of accidents caused by bikes and you'll see what I mean!
Hmm, well maybe I'm the only cyclist in all the hundred billion people on this planet that doesn't run red lights?!
These past few weeks I have been cycling up and down the south coast and realizing just how much better it is to cycle rather than driving, no massive
1 tonne cube to find a place to put! And you stay moderately healthy, and you can just coast along the seafront!
I cycled all the way to Worthing Pier last Sunday, that was great fun!
Anyway, I'm off to work, on my bike, to earn money to buy a car 
[Edited on 7/8/12 by vanepico]
[Edited on 7/8/12 by vanepico]
quote:
Originally posted by coyoteboy
Insurance for cyclists would be practically impossible to enforce, it would require registration of all cyclists (day hire cyclists, kids, registration of every bike, it'd cost more than VED to administer and be a complete waste of time). As a cyclist and a petrolhead I'd suggest you're better thinking of something else to worry about.
You have to pay road tax on a bicycle in Belgium. You get a little metal plate which you fix to the front forks. The plate has a number which identifies the owner of the bike
quote:
Originally posted by vanepico
Hmm, well maybe I'm the only cyclist in all the hundred billion people on this planet that doesn't run red lights?!
These past few weeks I have been cycling up and down the south coast and realizing just how much better it is to cycle rather than driving, no massive 1 tonne cube to find a place to put! And you stay moderately healthy, and you can just coast along the seafront!
I cycled all the way to Worthing Pier last Sunday, that was great fun!
Anyway, I'm off to work, on my bike, to earn money to buy a car
[Edited on 7/8/12 by vanepico]
[Edited on 7/8/12 by vanepico]
I nearly ran a cyclist over yesterday. I was turning left at a traffic-light-controlled junction and my view of the carriageway I was joining was
obscured by a building on the junction corner. So I cautiously turn left and am immediately met by a cyclist with all the gear on who is not only
running the red light... but he's riding across the junction diagonally INTO MY FLIPPIN PATH!!!
Needless to say, he felt my wrath!
As I've said on here in the past, as a cyclist sometimes the safest ways to ride are illegal or wee off other road users.
If I don't feel safe at a junction (due to it being weirdly positioned, me not being visible etc.) I'll jump a light, providing it's
safe and clear.
Pavements are fair play too if they're empty and the road isn't usable safely.
Also, I'll ride dead centre in my lane if I have to to be seen, or to not end up forced into the gutter, pisses some drivers right off.
Equally, if I'm riding with the kid, we'll be 2 abreast wherever possible so we don't get passed too fast, as he's not totally
confident on the road just yet.
I try to ride within the law, but due to a lot of incompetent and ignorant road users, I'll ride in a way which keeps me safe.
As far as insurance goes, I used to have it mainly to cover theft living in a city. Wasn't cheap, but well worth the peace of mind. Now I live
somewhere you can park £8k of bikes on the front, unlocked and people will leave them alone. Not entirely worth the cover.
In most cases cycles and vehicles manage to get through using the same peace of road with no drama, it is like a few have said that spoil it with
their actions. Cycles that either run red lights or leave the road and join the path at red lights?? Car drivers that don't give them an inch
when passing or stick right too their rear wheel pressurising them!
My pet hate is when the cycles come up my blind side at junctions when in the truck, even though my indicator is on in plenty time, big stickers on
the rear warning them not too and an audible warning alarm that I can hear when the window is down without fail they still come right up the inside
and wonder why the get run over!?!?
Every truck driver I speak to who delivers inner city say it is their biggest fear and no matter how much they check their mirrors they always have
some one come into their blind spots.
Is it ignorance, lack of training or just the don't give a damned attitude???
I think if I spent a lot of time on a bike I would consider it. It's only a token amount per year, and if it meant that I wouldn't lose
thousands due to me accidentally hitting a wing mirror or scraping a car then I think it's fair. It's like a helmet, you pray to god that
you never need to take advantage of it's padded lining but you still wear it 'just in case'.
Obviously the whole 'cyclist vs car' thing is another discussion, thankfully with me doing mostly motorway miles I rarely see cyclists on
the road.
We have lots of "road racer" types around our Village roads, probably as we are elevated so the roads in and out provide a "good
run" for them.
I have to say, some of them are a right pain. Only last week, I was entering my road which does have parked cars either side and saw three of these
cyclists in the distance along way behind me. I was approaching my drive and indicated left, just before my drive was a parked van delivering
something. Checked my mirrors and blind spot as the paths are used by a lot of young children. All clear so I turn left on to my drive.
Well how the cyclist missed me is beyond belief, he swerved and just missed me, almost colliding with the brick wall in front of my house. It really
shook me up, he could have been killed. His riding partner stopped and got a rollicking from me. A motorist behind me stopped and said he had
followed them through the entire high street and what they were doing was taking to the paths at "full speed" to avoid having to slow down
for the parked cars and traffic. A clear example of where I did absolutely nothing wrong and could have been involved with a very serious incident.
I was only so relieved that I was literally crawling onto my drive. To be on the paths at those speeds is just mental.
These guys were using the roads as their own personal Velodrome. What they don't understand I think is that, yes they are eco friendly and
perhaps more politically correct than car drivers, but when he bounces of the wing of my car and somersaults into a brick wall, he will still be very
seriously injured or worse.
A cyclist is the most vulnerable person to interact with traffic, but some of them seem to have this feeling of being invincible 
Oh and I worked in London for 8 years walking to many of my jobs and cyclists jumping red lights is a very real risk of causing accidents. I have
seen numerous occasions where accidents have happened with pedestrians due to this.
Not that I think insurance is the answer.
i've got a foot in both camps, being both a regular cyclist, motorcyclist, car owner and seven owner. Insurance for cyclists unmanageable as far
as I can see......
this country can't even manage a 100% insurance requirement on registered vehicles, no chance on the millions of bikes on the roads.
I commute approx 100miles/week by bicycle in all weathers, and do training rides of the same distance, so a fair amount of mileage and every day take
my life in my own hands doing so. I enjoy the freedom and sense of wellbeing getting somewhere on my bike. I'm one of them you see running red
lights, but do so with caution. I don't go just blasting across the junction all gung-ho, I approach with caution, and wait for a gap. As long as
I don't cause any pile-ups, accidents or inconvenience motorists with the right of way any problems, I don't see the problem.
I approach with caution and assess the risks bearing in mind the approach of the uninsured driver in an unroadworthy car, applying make-up whilst
texting, who hasn't even seen the lights !!!!
There's the problem......... Light jumping kerb hopping loons on two wheels stick out like a sore thumb, but if I had a pound for every driver
breaking the law who crosses my path on a daily basis, it'll more than pay for my 3rd party insurance on my bike.
When I'm behind the wheel I give cyclists the room they need, and do not to force them into a 6"wide track next to the curb. Expect the
unexpected when you come up behind a bike. On the flip side nothing annoys me more when in the car, is when cyclists ride 2 or 3 abreast where its
impractical. Its not the peleton in the Tour......single file please 
quote:
Originally posted by Minicooper
This is a joke right
"I can't think of a single situation where a cyclist could be at fault, its not like they are fast enough to cut you up, and then it is always the car driver who does that anyway. The difference between the damage a bike can do to a car and the damage a car can do to a cyclist is astronomical."
The amount of cyclists I have personally seen going through red lights for instance is amazing and that wouldn't be there fault if there was an accident as a result??
David
Easiest way to get 3rd party insurance with a bike is to join the CTC. About £50 per year.
There are some dreadful cyclists on the road and in Oxford quite a few are killed.
Good drivers can learn to anticipate what other road users might do and avoid incidents.
Ive been cycling to work since christmas, and its just like drivers, there are good cyclists and bad. I see some jumping reds, i see them cycing don
busy roads with no helmets or hi-vis. However I do think alot of drivers are arogant when it comes to cyclist, but this is quite obviously vice versa
to cyclists too. As with everything in life, people mostly think of themselves, whether its a cyclist jumping a red to save 20 seconds, or a driver
cutting accross in front of a cyclist trying to shave a fes seconds off their journey, instead of waiting behind the cyclist at 15mph for a few
moments.
What should be done rather than 'making' cyclist pay insurance or making them take compusary tests etc, would be some clarity and
consistancy in what local authorities and Gov do to promote cycling and the design of cycle friendly road systems.
There's nothing wrong with "Cyclists".....................
Its the Fxxking "Lycra louts" that think they are on the Tour de France riding on closed roads that are the problem.
There is a downhill stretch of road through our village and they come through at speeds they cannot expect to stop at. They have already put one old
chap in hospital, if they want to race use a track, we have to !!
I'm going to start carrying some carpet tacks with me 
RD
tough one
i saw the aftermath of a guy cycling down a hill
he had a helmet on but as it was hot, had shorts, flip flops and a t-shirt
he had shopping bags dangling on his handlebars
well you know what happens next
he hit a pothole, went over the top and hit his head on the kkerb edge
smashed skull fragments sticking out and an eye socket exploded (sorry for graphics)
his family wanted witnesses to say it was due to the pothole
highways started to argue that he was not wearing hi-vis, proper clothing etc
where does it all end?
our driving test needs a massive overhaul and updating, (same for M bikes too)
We should also treat cyclists in the same way (very contentious i know but if they are also using the same roads as everyone else then WE ALL need
better educating and higher levels of skills when out on the road)
How the heck we keep all this in perspective, without all the euro-crap and health and safety madness, is anyones guess.
On the insurance question, I think the Personal Liability of a Household insurance policy would kick in if there is no other policy in force.
Of course, Household insurance is not compulsory, so no guarantee they have it.
quote:
Originally posted by scudderfish
Come a be a pedestrian in London sometime. A number of us have been killed by cyclists ignoring red lights. My route from the station to my office means I cross three light controlled crossings, at least one will have a cyclist ignore it every time, and that doesn't count those who are too scared/lazy/looking for a short cut and decide to cycle on the pavement instead.
quote:
Originally posted by vanepico
I can't think of a single situation where a cyclist could be at fault, its not like they are fast enough to cut you up, and then it is always the car driver who does that anyway. The difference between the damage a bike can do to a car and the damage a car can do to a cyclist is astronomical.
.
Clearly there's no doubt cyclists can cause damage and injury. As can pedestrians. I've had to avoid pedestrians who jogged out into the
road unexpectedly, one time clipping a kerb and writing off a tyre. And if you want to live in a place like switzerland you can, I believe, kiss your
modified cars goodbye and live in a world (compulsory?) national service. Not sure it's my cup of tea.
I think pedestrians should have insurance too. Especially kids, they're virtually uncontrolled these days. And dogs - dogs run out all the time,
they do some damage if you hit them.
Use some perspective. What we need is better drive (and cyclist) training. I (and many others) propose that if you're going to
get a driving license you should ideally first spend plenty of time on a bike in a city and on fast roads so you can see how vulnerable cyclists are.
It's funny how, when some people have decided to switch from driving to cycling to work one of the first discussions they have with you is
"my god, I didn't realise how scary it is - cars just seem to come at you from all angles and overtake at 3x your speed a foot from your
elbow", or words to that effect. I believe this experience makes them better drivers. If we all took a bit more time, relaxed a bit and treated
each other with a bit more respect (and all obeyed the laws of the road) there would be much fewer issues and much fewer aggrivations.
[Edited on 7/8/12 by coyoteboy]
quote:
Originally posted by coyoteboy
I think pedestrians should have insurance too. Especially kids, they're virtually uncontrolled these days. And dogs - dogs run out all the time, they do some damage if you hit them.
[Edited on 7/8/12 by coyoteboy]