humerous taxman!!!??
Apologies for the length of this or if you have already seen it, but for anybody who hasn't, it's gotta be worth a read.
A genuine reply from Customer Relations at the Inland Revenue to yet another angry customer!.
Dear Mr Addison,
I am writing to you to express our thanks for your more than prompt reply to our latest communication, and also to answer some of the points you
raise. I will address them, as ever, in order.
Firstly, I must take issue with your description of our last as a "begging letter".
It might perhaps more properly be referred to as a "tax demand". This is how we, at the Inland Revenue have always, for reasons of
accuracy, traditionally referred to such documents.
Secondly, your frustration at our adding to the "endless stream of crapulent whining and panhandling vomited daily through the letterbox on to
the doormat" has been noted. However, whilst I have naturally not seen the other letters to which you refer I would cautiously suggest that
their being from "pauper councils, Lombardy pirate banking houses and pissant gas-mongerers" might indicate that your decision to
"file them next to the toilet in case of emergencies" is at best a little ill-advised. In common with my own organisation, it is unlikely
that the senders of these letters do see you as a"lackwit bumpkin or, come to that, a "sodding charity". More likely they see you as
a citizen of Great Britain, with a responsibility to contribute to the upkeep of the nation as a whole.
Which, brings me to my next point. Whilst there may be some spirit of truth in your assertion that the taxes you pay "go to shore up the
canker-blighted, toppling folly that is the Public Services", a moment's rudimentary calculation ought to disabuse you of the notion that
the government in any way expects you to "stump up for the whole damned party" yourself. The estimates you provide for the
Chancellor's disbursement of the funds levied by taxation, whilst colourful, are, in fairness, a little off the mark. Less than you seem to
imagine is spent on "junkets for Bunterish lickspittles" and "dancing whores" whilst far more than you have accounted for is
allocated to, for example, "that box-ticking facade of a university system."
A couple of technical points arising from direct queries:
1. The reason we don't simply write "Muggins" on the envelope has to do with the vagaries of the postal system;
2. You can rest assured that "sucking the very marrows of those with nothing else to give" has never been considered as a practice because
even if the Personal Allowance didn't render it irrelevant, the sheer medical logistics involved would make it financially unviable.
I trust this has helped. In the meantime, whilst I would not in any way wish to influence your decision one way or the other, I ought to point out
that even if you did choose to "give the whole foul jamboree up and go and live in India" you would still owe us the money.
Please forward it by Friday.
Yours Sincerely,
********* Customer Relations
Makes me smile everytime I read it.
Have a good weekend all.
Dave
|
