AndyW
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 03:40 PM |
|
|
one wing landing? Is it possible ?
Yup
link
|
|
|
steve m
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 05:01 PM |
|
|
I am sure that has been on here before,
It has been on one the other forums i frequent and was declared a fake
Steve
|
|
geoff shep
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 05:20 PM |
|
|
That one was real I think, but happened some time ago - there was one of a prop aerobatic aircraft that was faked.
http://www.f-16.net/varia_article8.html
|
|
russbost
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 05:49 PM |
|
|
Yes, that one was genuine, the faked one was a Red Bull prop plane, very cleverly done, but it was a radio controlled plane that lost the wing,
cleverley cut with footage from a real airshow.
It is only possible with a massive amount of power to weight on tap, hence possible with the F15 or radio control plane, but not with an ordinary
propellor driven aircraft. Even in the cases where it's been done it still requires tremendous skill on the part of the pilot & a landing
speed of more than double what is normal. The other minor detail for most prop aircraft is that the wheels are frequently attached to the wings -
could make landing a touch trickier with one wing & one wheel!
[Edited on 15/4/11 by russbost]
I no longer run Furore Products or Furore Cars Ltd, but would still highly recommend them for Acewell dashes, projector headlights, dominator
headlights, indicators, mirrors etc, best prices in the UK! Take a look at http://www.furoreproducts.co.uk/ or find more parts on Ebay, user names
furoreltd & furoreproducts, discounts available for LCB users.
Don't forget Stainless Steel Braided brake hoses, made to your exact requirements in any of around 16 colours.
http://shop.ebay.co.uk/furoreproducts/m.html?_dmd=1&_ipg=50&_sop=12&_rdc=1
|
NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
|
JoelP
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 06:01 PM |
|
|
cant see why he bothered myself, the risk to the pilot surely outweighed the scrap value of that lot, so why not just eject?
|
|
scudderfish
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 06:08 PM |
|
|
F15 is also helped by the fact that it gets a lot of lift from the aerodynamics of it's fuselage.
|
|
David Jenkins
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 06:17 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JoelP
cant see why he bothered myself, the risk to the pilot surely outweighed the scrap value of that lot, so why not just eject?
Perhaps because ejecting is in itself a high-risk action - most pilots end up a half-inch or so shorter, permanently, due to spinal compression.
|
|
mackei23b
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 06:28 PM |
|
|
1st ejection in a Martin Baker seat and you join the club and get a nice tie!
After iether the 2 or 3 you can't fly again!
[Edited on 15/4/11 by mackei23b]
|
|
deltron63
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 06:34 PM |
|
|
They can land with NO wings.............. it's called a crash
|
|
britishtrident
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 06:45 PM |
|
|
ISTR there was a case of a US Navy fighter that took off and landed with the wings folded ----- not sure if it was an LTV F8 or an A7
[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]
|
|
MikeRJ
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 07:33 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by steve m
I am sure that has been on here before,
It has been on one the other forums i frequent and was declared a fake
There's a surprise. No doubt an opinion expressed by an expert 13 year old.
|
|
Benzine
|
posted on 15/4/11 at 07:45 PM |
|
|
should have ditched it and just dipped into the $3 billion of US funding for a new shiny one
|
|
907
|
posted on 16/4/11 at 06:34 AM |
|
|
I almost believed this up until just after the impact.
The cockpit camera, mounted in the front of the bubble, shows the pilots head spinning
as the plane rolls rapidly.
The camera would be rolling with the aircraft, as would the pilot.
The only thing that should appear to move is the scenery outside the aircraft.
Schoolboy error.
Paul G
|
|
scudderfish
|
posted on 16/4/11 at 07:04 AM |
|
|
The video is pure re-enactment for a TV show. The story is true though.
|
|
Liam
|
posted on 16/4/11 at 11:01 AM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by 907
I almost believed this up until just after the impact.
The cockpit camera, mounted in the front of the bubble, shows the pilots head spinning
as the plane rolls rapidly.
The camera would be rolling with the aircraft, as would the pilot.
The only thing that should appear to move is the scenery outside the aircraft.
Schoolboy error.
Paul G
You ever use to watch 999? Those weren't the real emercencies all captured on camera, you know :p
|
|
907
|
posted on 16/4/11 at 09:55 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Liam
quote: Originally posted by 907
I almost believed this up until just after the impact.
The cockpit camera, mounted in the front of the bubble, shows the pilots head spinning
as the plane rolls rapidly.
The camera would be rolling with the aircraft, as would the pilot.
The only thing that should appear to move is the scenery outside the aircraft.
Schoolboy error.
Paul G
You ever use to watch 999? Those weren't the real emercencies all captured on camera, you know :p
But, but, but..... If it's on film, telly, or in the newspapers, it must be true.
Paul G
|
|
Ninehigh
|
posted on 20/4/11 at 08:56 AM |
|
|
This was done on a program similar to Mythbusters, and it's possible but really difficult and you only get one go.
Also iirc flying that way (with both wings) is a stunt called "Blade-ing" or something to that effect
|
|
T66
|
posted on 25/4/11 at 11:02 PM |
|
|
The video is a patched together job to add drama. Without sounding spotter like, the A4 the pilot talks about colliding with, when cut with video was
a F100.
The speed of the air on the fuselage and the huge twin tail, will have increased dramatically after he gave it the gun. So less lift from one wing,
but forward speed and the big tail fins allowed him to recover from the spin.
Helicopters when they lose a tail rotor when transiting dont spin out of control, because of the air passing along their fuselage, ie the rudder
effect of the tailfin keeps it straight.
different matter when in the hover.
This article, looks genuine to me, with plenty of added drama.
|
|