Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: one wing landing? Is it possible ?
AndyW

posted on 15/4/11 at 03:40 PM Reply With Quote
one wing landing? Is it possible ?

Yup


link

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
steve m

posted on 15/4/11 at 05:01 PM Reply With Quote
I am sure that has been on here before,

It has been on one the other forums i frequent and was declared a fake

Steve

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
geoff shep

posted on 15/4/11 at 05:20 PM Reply With Quote
That one was real I think, but happened some time ago - there was one of a prop aerobatic aircraft that was faked.

http://www.f-16.net/varia_article8.html






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
russbost

posted on 15/4/11 at 05:49 PM Reply With Quote
Yes, that one was genuine, the faked one was a Red Bull prop plane, very cleverly done, but it was a radio controlled plane that lost the wing, cleverley cut with footage from a real airshow.

It is only possible with a massive amount of power to weight on tap, hence possible with the F15 or radio control plane, but not with an ordinary propellor driven aircraft. Even in the cases where it's been done it still requires tremendous skill on the part of the pilot & a landing speed of more than double what is normal. The other minor detail for most prop aircraft is that the wheels are frequently attached to the wings - could make landing a touch trickier with one wing & one wheel!

[Edited on 15/4/11 by russbost]





I no longer run Furore Products or Furore Cars Ltd, but would still highly recommend them for Acewell dashes, projector headlights, dominator headlights, indicators, mirrors etc, best prices in the UK! Take a look at http://www.furoreproducts.co.uk/ or find more parts on Ebay, user names furoreltd & furoreproducts, discounts available for LCB users.
Don't forget Stainless Steel Braided brake hoses, made to your exact requirements in any of around 16 colours. http://shop.ebay.co.uk/furoreproducts/m.html?_dmd=1&_ipg=50&_sop=12&_rdc=1

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
JoelP

posted on 15/4/11 at 06:01 PM Reply With Quote
cant see why he bothered myself, the risk to the pilot surely outweighed the scrap value of that lot, so why not just eject?






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
scudderfish

posted on 15/4/11 at 06:08 PM Reply With Quote
F15 is also helped by the fact that it gets a lot of lift from the aerodynamics of it's fuselage.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
David Jenkins

posted on 15/4/11 at 06:17 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JoelP
cant see why he bothered myself, the risk to the pilot surely outweighed the scrap value of that lot, so why not just eject?


Perhaps because ejecting is in itself a high-risk action - most pilots end up a half-inch or so shorter, permanently, due to spinal compression.






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
mackei23b

posted on 15/4/11 at 06:28 PM Reply With Quote
1st ejection in a Martin Baker seat and you join the club and get a nice tie!

After iether the 2 or 3 you can't fly again!

[Edited on 15/4/11 by mackei23b]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
deltron63

posted on 15/4/11 at 06:34 PM Reply With Quote
They can land with NO wings.............. it's called a crash
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 15/4/11 at 06:45 PM Reply With Quote
ISTR there was a case of a US Navy fighter that took off and landed with the wings folded ----- not sure if it was an LTV F8 or an A7





[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 15/4/11 at 07:33 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by steve m
I am sure that has been on here before,

It has been on one the other forums i frequent and was declared a fake



There's a surprise. No doubt an opinion expressed by an expert 13 year old.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Benzine

posted on 15/4/11 at 07:45 PM Reply With Quote
should have ditched it and just dipped into the $3 billion of US funding for a new shiny one
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
907

posted on 16/4/11 at 06:34 AM Reply With Quote
I almost believed this up until just after the impact.


The cockpit camera, mounted in the front of the bubble, shows the pilots head spinning
as the plane rolls rapidly.



The camera would be rolling with the aircraft, as would the pilot.
The only thing that should appear to move is the scenery outside the aircraft.

Schoolboy error.

Paul G

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
scudderfish

posted on 16/4/11 at 07:04 AM Reply With Quote
The video is pure re-enactment for a TV show. The story is true though.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Liam

posted on 16/4/11 at 11:01 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by 907
I almost believed this up until just after the impact.


The cockpit camera, mounted in the front of the bubble, shows the pilots head spinning
as the plane rolls rapidly.



The camera would be rolling with the aircraft, as would the pilot.
The only thing that should appear to move is the scenery outside the aircraft.

Schoolboy error.

Paul G


You ever use to watch 999? Those weren't the real emercencies all captured on camera, you know :p

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
907

posted on 16/4/11 at 09:55 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Liam
quote:
Originally posted by 907
I almost believed this up until just after the impact.


The cockpit camera, mounted in the front of the bubble, shows the pilots head spinning
as the plane rolls rapidly.



The camera would be rolling with the aircraft, as would the pilot.
The only thing that should appear to move is the scenery outside the aircraft.

Schoolboy error.

Paul G


You ever use to watch 999? Those weren't the real emercencies all captured on camera, you know :p





But, but, but..... If it's on film, telly, or in the newspapers, it must be true.

Paul G

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ninehigh

posted on 20/4/11 at 08:56 AM Reply With Quote
This was done on a program similar to Mythbusters, and it's possible but really difficult and you only get one go.

Also iirc flying that way (with both wings) is a stunt called "Blade-ing" or something to that effect






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
T66

posted on 25/4/11 at 11:02 PM Reply With Quote
The video is a patched together job to add drama. Without sounding spotter like, the A4 the pilot talks about colliding with, when cut with video was a F100.


The speed of the air on the fuselage and the huge twin tail, will have increased dramatically after he gave it the gun. So less lift from one wing, but forward speed and the big tail fins allowed him to recover from the spin.


Helicopters when they lose a tail rotor when transiting dont spin out of control, because of the air passing along their fuselage, ie the rudder effect of the tailfin keeps it straight.


different matter when in the hover.



This article, looks genuine to me, with plenty of added drama.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.