Hi all
Been a away for a while, kids, mortgages & change of jobs, but now fancy another toy car . I've built an mkindy with r1 engine in about 3
years ago. Great car but want a more usable car engined version. Always loved, and if I'm honest, preferred the mnr. So this is the route
I'd like to take. I like the idea of using mx5 parts as had a lots of these in the past and know they are great cars. My aim is to build one,
get it on the road and then turbo charge it. The main question is does the mnr take the 1.8 version. Don't seem to be able to find anything on
their site and I notice a lot tend to use the 1.6. Would prefer to start with the 1.8.
Would I be financially better off doing a zetec? I see people are turbo charging these too.
Any advice would be much appreciated. can't wait to get cracking. Will be at Newark kit car show without fail
Cheers
Adam
Mines got a St170 in it, keep up no problem and now its time for a turbo.. easy cheap way to 350bhp
That should make it quick enough
I'll be at Newark on the mnr stand so come have a look!
[Edited on 4/6/12 by coozer]
I thought the general consensus was that the 1.6 was considered the better bet if you wished to turbo charge the Mazda MX5 motor
You might want to look at some of the MX5 forums, there is loads of info out there.
[Edited on 4/6/2012 by Hector.Brocklebank]
I was always lead to believe that the 1.8 was a stronger engine hence turbo would be better on them. Was just wondering if the mnr would take a
1.8?
Cheers
Adam
from my reading in standard trim the 1.6 is the better of the two engines, and that the 1.6 requires less work as its already a low compression engine
in its standard state of tune, BBR did a kit that was so good mazda endorsed it as an O.E. bit of kit
linky
and from flyin miata
Mazda MX-5 Miata Eunos 1.6L Turbo Conversion Kit MX5 B6 | eBay
I fancy doing one myself and fitting a body kit to an early MX5 from Tribute Automotive
tribute automotive
quote:
Originally posted by Adam
I was always lead to believe that the 1.8 was a stronger engine hence turbo would be better on them. Was just wondering if the mnr would take a 1.8?
Cheers
Adam
I also seem to remember reading that the Eunos Roadster (the imported Mazda) came with the 1.6 engine but the upgraded diff?
Thats right but it wasnt standard fit, was on the options list.
quote:
Originally posted by Adam
I was always lead to believe that the 1.8 was a stronger engine hence turbo would be better on them. Was just wondering if the mnr would take a 1.8?
Cheers
Adam
The MK1 1.6 has smaller/weaker gearbox, diff, driveshafts and smaller brakes.
The mk2 1.6 and 1.8 use the same running gear apart from later sports that have even larger brakes.
The compression ratio on both engines 9.5:1 is suitable for turbo or supercharging. The only reason for using a 1.6 might be there used to be more
tuning parts available for it. Now that really isn't the case.
A lot of imported cars come with LSD but not all. The recognised better diff is the mk2 Torsen b type diff.
I have and would go for a mk2 1.8 (better head) on the stronger 6 speed gearbox.
Find a well specced mk2 with the gearbox and diff, eather etc. Take the bits you need sell the rest on ebay and like I did get a free donor!
Oh then fit megasquirt and an MP62 Supercharger for 250bhp
quote:
Originally posted by rdodger
The MK1 1.6 has smaller/weaker gearbox, diff, driveshafts and smaller brakes.
Last time I spoke to MNR was advised that they have kits for both 1.8 and 1.6. So you can use either diff.
Hi
I have Chassis 81 which was or is the 1st MX5 chassis made by MNR. It has 1.8 everything, (engine, 5 speed box, diff, brakes) many of you will have
seen it if you have been to Stoneleigh or Newark in the last couple of years. It will be at Newark in a couple of weeks. Look for the "Northern
Roadsters Club". Weather permitting I will be there both days.
I may up the power but can't see how it will increase the "grin factor", so we will see. Anyway its quicker than most 140bhp at 560kgs,
and remember "its not always the size its the pleasure it gives!!!"
Dave