Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Compression qu.
Benzine

posted on 25/11/09 at 08:15 PM Reply With Quote
Compression qu.

My volvo engine has a standard compression ratio of 10:1. I've used pistons from a volvo turbo engine to reduce this to 9:1 for forced induction.

The problem is I've little time to work on it at the moment and I just want to get it running and on the road. At the moment I have a megasquirt set up and was going down the forced induction route. That will require a fair bit more fabrication so I was thinking of going down a simpler route for now, and then later I can go forced induction.

What are the pros and cons of running a lower compression n/a? (carbs/bike carbs/whatever) I presume it'll drink more but that doesn't really bother me for a weekend toy... and what would be the most simple route to take to get it running? 3 webers in a row?





The mental gymnastics a landlord will employ to justify immoral actions is clinically fascinating. Just because something is legal doesn't make it moral.


View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
02GF74

posted on 25/11/09 at 08:23 PM Reply With Quote
pros - plenty of land rovers sunning on 8.something CR so no probs there. won't need to worry about timing as pre-ignition is less an issue.

higher CR is related to power and efficiency so con is you have less power hence will be slower plus slightly higher mpg.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Volvorsport

posted on 25/11/09 at 08:42 PM Reply With Quote
if its megasquirted , do that .

if not 6 bike carbs and megajolt , or maybe even running a jaguar dizzy and points .

i reckon if you can a manual ecu from a 960 , you could even have it running on the std injection given a couple of weekends .

otherwise i wouldnt worry about it - itll just feel down on popwer , most redblocks run 9:1 or lower std .





www.dbsmotorsport.co.uk
getting dirty under a bus

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Canada EH!

posted on 25/11/09 at 09:57 PM Reply With Quote
Octane rating can be lower, quieter exhaust, less chance of pre-ignition, more torque.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 25/11/09 at 10:17 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Canada EH! more torque.


Less torque!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
baz-R

posted on 27/11/09 at 12:23 AM Reply With Quote
should be no biggy will not be as efficent (a little smoother)
loads of pre cat engines had lower comp ratios in th 9's
tho getting max ign advance with unleaded may be a bit trickey today.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.