steve m
|
posted on 26/4/16 at 05:48 PM |
|
|
Bath or shower
We are planning on a Bathroom revamp, well I wasn't but swmbo has !
we currently have a bath, with a shower in it, but the bath is rarely used, by either of us
as we both prefer showers
if I was to put a proper shower cubicle in, there would not be room for a bath as well.
What are peoples views, on perhaps buying a house with only a shower room, but no bath facility, as if we were to sell in the next 10 years that could
possibly be a fail point, as in not having a bath
steve
Thats was probably spelt wrong, or had some grammer, that the "grammer police have to have a moan at
|
|
|
JacksAvon
|
posted on 26/4/16 at 05:53 PM |
|
|
Swarfega is the way forward
The sickness started in 2001 with a Robin Hood 3A, Prelit Westy,Tiger Cub, Tiger Avon, Tiger R6, 16v Mini, Sylva Fury Fireblade, Westfield Sei,
Mallock Mk11, Fireblade Locost, Tiger Avon, Procomp LA Gold, Mk26 Mallock...........and now a Mk18 Mallock.....LR750, Vandiemen FX02
|
|
BenB
|
posted on 26/4/16 at 05:53 PM |
|
|
Is it a family style home? Who are you intended customers? With sprogs baths are much easier (and popular) than showers.
|
|
blakep82
|
posted on 26/4/16 at 06:04 PM |
|
|
Very good question...
I havent had a bath in years, but I always find it strange to see a house with no bath. Not sure why, but I expect if I was looking to buy, no bath
would put me off, even though it's completely irrational.
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
40inches
|
posted on 26/4/16 at 06:13 PM |
|
|
Took the bath out around 8 years ago, never missed it, re-tiled and put in a walk in cubicle, the type without a door.
Should also say that the floors and walls were tiled first, the cubicle can be easily removed and a bath fitted, if it stops a sale.
[Edited on 26-4-16 by 40inches]
|
|
morcus
|
posted on 26/4/16 at 06:28 PM |
|
|
I'm currently looking to buy my first house, and even though I know I can change what ever I want I find it hard to consider a house without a
bath (I've only rented before and obviously no bath then effectively means no bath ever). I do actually use the bath though for its intended
purpose about once a fortnight.
On the other hand if you don't want one its not worth caring too much what theoretical future buyers want. My parents spent years doing up one
of their houses to sell with no luck, when they gave up and did it how they actually wanted that's when it sold.
In a White Room, With Black Curtains, By the Station.
|
|
steve m
|
posted on 26/4/16 at 06:32 PM |
|
|
"Is it a family style home? Who are you intended customers? With sprogs baths are much easier (and popular) than showers"
It is a family style of home, as in four bedrooms etc, near schools, in fact, thats why we bought the place, when the kids were 5 and 8
funny thing is that when we bought this place, it only had a shower, and installed a bath a couple of years later,
so it did not put us off, but currently we have no plans to move,
steve
Thats was probably spelt wrong, or had some grammer, that the "grammer police have to have a moan at
|
|
motorcycle_mayhem
|
posted on 26/4/16 at 06:34 PM |
|
|
Really is a personal thing, so let's get a personal viewpoint, mine. I don't have kids, my last house didn't have a bath, just a
shower - and that was off the kitchen on the ground floor of a 2-up 2-down ex-Authority. I didn't even think about the negatives of either,
since I wanted the house for other reasons.
Current house has a similar issue as you. There is a bath, it's a 1.7 metre job that's been built into a wall(!), since the bathroom is
too small. A 1.5 metre shoebox bath would fit, but it's the shower above the bath (electric) that gets used, so it makes sense to remove it all
and go that route. Even more so in my case, since there's no central hot water available. I just can't be arsed, life is too short, cancer
or the care home may be just around the corner.
So... would a shower-only bathroom stop *me* from buying your house - no. The only thing that would stop me would be your unrealistic financial
expectation from sale.
|
|
steve m
|
posted on 26/4/16 at 06:40 PM |
|
|
"no. The only thing that would stop me would be your unrealistic financial expectation from sale"
minus a bath
hahahahahha
so £450k is a bit to high for you ?
Thats was probably spelt wrong, or had some grammer, that the "grammer police have to have a moan at
|
|
twybrow
|
posted on 26/4/16 at 07:28 PM |
|
|
I would echo the family comment. If you have no desire to move, then do what suits you, but otherwise i would put in a bath to be safe. What about a
shower bath (P-shaped)? Best of both worlds....
|
|
dhutch
|
posted on 26/4/16 at 07:36 PM |
|
|
I do not have a shower very often at all, it can be years between showers.
However if I have the time, do actaully really like them, and with my last GF we would make quite an effort to get home early enough to have one
together maybe once every 8 weeks or so, so on that basis alone I would consider it a negative aspect for a house to have shower only. I have also
used it once or twice to do think like wash a rug in.
My house has a p-shaped bath, which makes a nice shower area. I would have put the taps in the middle too, so there was not a 'tap end'
for when sharing. Prevents changing the tap from the side, but a lot of taps now are on stations and or very serviceable, so it should not be an
issue. Other than replacing the really cheap crap brand less tat the previous owner fitted the only tap-ware I have had to replace is the mixed unit
in my parents house which could be changed from the front with ease, leaving the base tiled into the wall, that was after 20 years just over, all
other taps in the house are still original an untouched.
Daniel
|
|
nick205
|
posted on 27/4/16 at 10:29 AM |
|
|
I've not read every post above, but IMHO a shower cubicle and no bath is fine for me - I dislike having a bath anyway. We have a shower in a
bath and I just shower. We do however have 3 kids aged 10 and twins of 8 so giving them a bath is preferable to letting them loose in the shower - we
also live in a 3 bedroom family house. Ideally I'd convert the bathroom into a 4th bedroom and give the 3 kids a bedroom each. I'd then
convert a rather large upstairs cupboard/room next to the bathroom into a shower room. Being next to the bathroom and with the combi boiler the other
side of it drains and water would be easy enough to do.
|
|
loggyboy
|
posted on 27/4/16 at 10:46 AM |
|
|
If you don't plan on selling in next 5-10 years then do what you want. If you do then keep the bath IMO.
We have a good bath that has a very flat wide end and a built in lip for a shower screen. Its a great happy medium as I always shower, but the kids
love to bath still (2 and 5 years old).
Sadly all the similar ones that are advertised now are L or P shaped and ugly, ours is a nice angled affair.
It was by these people http://www.astracast.com/uk/products/baths/
[Edited on 27-4-16 by loggyboy]
Mistral Motorsport
|
|
David Jenkins
|
posted on 27/4/16 at 12:45 PM |
|
|
We recently refitted our bathroom - it's small, we used a shower over the bath, and that was getting to be a PITA. The bath was in a stupid
place - under the window - so we had to shut the blinds before stepping into the bath/shower. The bath was also a bit small as it had to fit into a
limited space.
Now, the bath has gone and we have a walk-in shower cubicle in the opposite corner of the bathroom. We also have a lot more floor-space now.
|
|
steve m
|
posted on 27/4/16 at 01:54 PM |
|
|
Thanks Guys
Some useful thoughts, to delve through,
we would still have the room to plonk a bath over the intended shower area, if required
thanks
steve
Thats was probably spelt wrong, or had some grammer, that the "grammer police have to have a moan at
|
|