Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Bike speedo calibration
chrisg

posted on 14/3/06 at 08:45 PM Reply With Quote
Bike speedo calibration

I've fitted my bike speedo today and the fly in the ointment is that it reads in Kms.

I need to calibrate it now as I'd like miles an hour, I'm pretty sure it's just a matter of putting in an incorrect diameter, probably a fixed ratio, trouble is I don't know which one!!

are there any mathmeticians that could help me out??


Cheers

Chris

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 14/3/06 at 08:48 PM Reply With Quote
Are you sure you cant switch the cycle speedo to MPH. Most of them are switchable but defaulted to KPH.

David





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
chrisg

posted on 14/3/06 at 09:15 PM Reply With Quote
No mate it's just Kms.

any ideas?

Cheers

Chris

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 14/3/06 at 09:24 PM Reply With Quote
Well 1 mile = 1.609344 km.

So multiply your wheel circumference by 1.6 and see if that gets you the right speed (you need less pulse per unit distance, so increasing the diameter should bring the speed reading down...) If my logic has become twisted (not unusual) try dividing by 1.6 and see if that works.

Probably wont work, but its too late to do the maths...

David

[Edited on 14/3/06 by flak monkey]





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
DIY Si

posted on 14/3/06 at 09:31 PM Reply With Quote
kph/1.609344=mph. Just for all you lazy student types.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
chrisg

posted on 14/3/06 at 10:17 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by flak monkey
Well 1 mile = 1.609344 km.

So multiply your wheel circumference by 1.6 and see if that gets you the right speed (you need less pulse per unit distance, so increasing the diameter should bring the speed reading down...) If my logic has become twisted (not unusual) try dividing by 1.6 and see if that works.

Probably wont work, but its too late to do the maths...

David

[Edited on 14/3/06 by flak monkey]


seems logical to me.

I'll give it a go.

thanks to all

cheers

Chris

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.