Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: odyssey pc680 vs pc925
RK

posted on 6/1/12 at 12:39 AM Reply With Quote
odyssey pc680 vs pc925

Had to replace the pc680, as it was not holding a charge anymore (4 years of fooling around with the car, and two weeks' driving). The battery shop recommended going to the much bigger, and more expensive pc925, which I did. Now I am seeing just how small and convenient the old one was. Was the pc925 a waste of extra money?

[Edited on 6/1/12 by RK]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dusty

posted on 6/1/12 at 02:33 AM Reply With Quote
Not a waste of money as you have an excellent battery that will more than cope with your needs. I have a PC545 which is fine after three and half years on a tuned zetec. But I do 5000+ all year round which probably keeps the battery healthy. You probably didn't need the bigger battery, just to use it or keep it on a conditioner.

[Edited on 6/1/12 by Dusty]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ben_Copeland

posted on 6/1/12 at 04:00 PM Reply With Quote
The pc680 is plenty. Mine used to start an old xflow now starts a 2.0l Vauxhall no problem. With these batteries you need a battery charger/conditioner if it's laid up for any length of time because they don't like being left flat/low charge.





Ben

Locost Map on Google Maps


Z20LET Astra Turbo, into a Haynes Roadster

Enter Your Details Here
http://www.facebook.com/EquinoxProducts for all your bodywork needs!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.