scotty g
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 07:22 PM |
|
|
GOOD GOD THATS FUGLY!
Sorry but i just couldn't bring myself to put it in the bargains section.
It really is ugly, even by Robin Hood standards.
Be warned
|
|
|
mistergrumpy
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 07:25 PM |
|
|
That can't be real. Must be photo edited or summat. My God
|
|
Danozeman
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 07:26 PM |
|
|
I quite like it in a strange way. Not sure about that windscreen though...
Dan
Built the purple peril!! Let the modifications begin!!
http://www.eastangliankitcars.co.uk
|
|
iank
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 07:42 PM |
|
|
Wouldn't want to test those roll bars
|
|
JoelP
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 07:45 PM |
|
|
diabolical roll bars and far too much rake on the windscreen.
|
|
stevec
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 07:52 PM |
|
|
Yuk.
|
|
mark.s
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 07:53 PM |
|
|
to much rake and glass i'd say...what donor car/plane did that come from
cheers mark
|
|
mackei23b
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 08:04 PM |
|
|
No so much of the GO, but STOP right now!!
|
|
mitch2b
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 08:07 PM |
|
|
Sierra,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,but its the rear one, at least its heated
one of the many prototypes that never saw the light of day until Richard Stewart sold the company
Mitch
|
|
balidey
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 08:26 PM |
|
|
Oh dear god, please make it go away...
|
|
trextr7monkey
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 08:29 PM |
|
|
Back end needs jacking upand some massive wheels under - dragster look
What did they call that bloke that wrote the Mr Men books and designed all of those "back to basics" cars?
Bring him back I say
http://www.flickr.com/photos/14016102@N00/ (cut and paste this dodgey link)
Our most recent pics are here:
http://s129.photobucket.com/albums/p211/trextr7monkey/
|
|
stevec
|
posted on 3/11/06 at 08:45 PM |
|
|
Roger Hargreaves?
Steve.
|
|
stevebubs
|
posted on 4/11/06 at 12:00 AM |
|
|
anyone seen the Kaig in the flesh?
One question comes to mind.
WHY!!!!???
|
|
omega 24 v6
|
posted on 4/11/06 at 12:27 AM |
|
|
Well as they say you can't polish a turd. It is hucking forendous.IMHO
If it looks wrong it probably is wrong.
|
|
millenniumtree
|
posted on 4/11/06 at 02:05 AM |
|
|
There's something seriously wrong with the windshield. I think the mountings rusted out.
The tires must be flat in the back.
Such a tiny nosecone! Keep it above 60 mph or it overheats.
Gawd what a monster.
|
|
BusaLoco
|
posted on 4/11/06 at 04:02 AM |
|
|
Oops!
Oh Dear!
|
|
zetec
|
posted on 4/11/06 at 07:04 AM |
|
|
The strange thing is someone walked up to it and thought "I really like that" I'll get some cash and take it home to show all my
mates!
[Edited on 4/11/06 by zetec]
" I only registered to look at the pictures, now I'm stuck with this username for the rest of my life!"
|
|
t.j.
|
posted on 4/11/06 at 08:05 AM |
|
|
Someone must buy it, and try to distroy it as sone as possible!
That is really ugly, the windscreen does give me as wooooooeeeesssss-feeling.
So, who buy's it proud of all the locosts???
|
|
Jonte
|
posted on 4/11/06 at 10:16 AM |
|
|
probably a reason why it´s only a one-off build
Click it
|
|
triumphdave
|
posted on 4/11/06 at 10:35 AM |
|
|
quote:......This is a one off kit car. It was built by Robin Hood Engineering as a demonstrater
but never put in to production
I wonder why?
If you always do what you have always done you will always get what you have always got
|
|
graememk
|
posted on 4/11/06 at 01:05 PM |
|
|
it wasnt put into production because they had sva probs with it, there were quite a few "go's" in the nottingham warehouse when i
bought my rhm100, another prototype.
|
|
skydivepaul
|
posted on 4/11/06 at 06:08 PM |
|
|
styling and good taste optional
http://www.smartideasuk.com
http://www.smartmapping.co.uk
HD CCTV
3D design solutions and integration
IP security systems
access control systems
|
|
Dazza
|
posted on 4/11/06 at 06:28 PM |
|
|
arrrrrrrgggghhhhh
now, i love jago's, and get ribbed for it, i have been known to have the odd sh@t car or 2, as a few of you will remimd me i am sure....
lol...... BUT!!!!
That is so damn strange looking, and even i would say ugly, that even i dont think i would want that in my drive way!!!!!!!!
AND, that windscreen HAS to be either a rear screen sierra style, or a lorry, or a bus, or something from a double glazing reject shop.,...... lol
...... NO NO NO!!
[Edited on 4/11/06 by Dazza]
fuckit
|
PLEASE NOTE: This user is a trader who has not signed up for the LocostBuilders registration scheme. If this post is advertising a commercial product or service, please report it by clicking here.
|
scotty g
|
posted on 5/11/06 at 07:44 AM |
|
|
Not only is it the Sierra rear screen but it looks like its actually the entire tailgate welded/bolted to the car.
The singer wiper location gives it away, also look at the image (if your stomach can stand it) showing the interior and dash area, the screen surround
is remarkably similar to the sierra hatch!
Bad enough that they used the rear screen but to leave it in the frame is just lazy!
|
|
akumabito
|
posted on 5/11/06 at 05:05 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by scotty g
Not only is it the Sierra rear screen but it looks like its actually the entire tailgate welded/bolted to the car.
The singer wiper location gives it away, also look at the image (if your stomach can stand it) showing the interior and dash area, the screen surround
is remarkably similar to the sierra hatch!
Bad enough that they used the rear screen but to leave it in the frame is just lazy!
Perhaps it was an attempt to fabricate a sub-100 quid kit
|
|