Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Acewell 2755, wich 0/100 ohm fuel sender?
Rudy

posted on 10/2/07 at 08:39 PM Reply With Quote
Acewell 2755, wich 0/100 ohm fuel sender?

Hi friends,
I have ace 2755, may anybody tell me where can I buy a 0/100 ohm fuel sender?
I think 2755 is very nice for the price (165 euro delivered in italy), it haves also some warning lamps,





Sorry about my English

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Rudy

posted on 10/2/07 at 08:41 PM Reply With Quote
foto Rescued attachment ace2755.jpg
Rescued attachment ace2755.jpg






Sorry about my English

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
craig1410

posted on 10/2/07 at 11:19 PM Reply With Quote
Hi,
Check out this thread:
http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=46296

Not every sender can be corrected using a resistor.

Firstly you need to ensure that the sender works in the correct sense. For example, 0-100 ohms empty to full or 0-100 ohms full to empty. You then need to find a sender which is as close to 0-100ohms as possible but should not to be less than this. The sender I am using goes from 0-180 ohms and I can correct this back to 0-100 ohms by using a 220 ohm resistor in parallel.

Here is the formula to calculate the parallel resistance required:

R = (Rrequired * Rsender)/(Rsender - Rrequired)

eg (100 * 180)/(180-100) = 225 ohms (220 ohms is a standard value)

HTH,
Craig.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Rudy

posted on 11/2/07 at 07:30 AM Reply With Quote
Thank you friends.....
..but there is a little problem:
if you put in parallel a resistor when tank is empty you have the right mesurament but when tank is for example 1/3 you do not have the right mesurament becouse a 0/100 sender should be 66.66 ohm, a 0/180 sender with 220 ohm resistor in parallel is about 40.74 ohm.
Have I miss anything?
......However I will use a (easy to find)0/180 ohm as you did.





Sorry about my English

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
craig1410

posted on 11/2/07 at 08:38 PM Reply With Quote
Hi Rudy,
You are quite correct, there will be a non-linearity introduced by the parallel resistance which is why you need to choose a sender which is as close as possible the the resistance expected by the gauge.

Here are some calculations to show the distortion:
0% (0 ohm) = 0 ohm (error 0%)
10% (18 ohm) = 17 ohm (error 66%)
20% (36 ohm) = 31 ohm (error 55%)
30% (54 ohm) = 43 ohm (error 45%)
40% (72 ohm) = 54 ohm (error 36%)
50% (90 ohm) = 64 ohm (error 28%)
60% (108 ohm) = 72 ohm (error 21%)
70% (126 ohm) = 80 ohm (error 14%)
80% (144 ohm) = 87 ohm (error 9%)
90% (162 ohm) = 93 ohm (error 4%)
100% (180 ohm) = 99 ohm (error -1%)

As you can see the error decreases as the sender resistance increases which IIRC means it will get more accurate as the tank approaches empty. I don't think this will cause too many problems, especially if you are aware of it.

HTH,
Craig.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Rudy

posted on 12/2/07 at 07:12 AM Reply With Quote
yes, Craig, you say the right.
Thankyou.





Sorry about my English

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.