Board logo

Oh dear .... but I kinda expected it ....
02GF74 - 11/8/09 at 08:19 PM

not good - that is a thinn knife blade and it's a tight fit. Rescued attachment DSC04817.JPG
Rescued attachment DSC04817.JPG


owelly - 11/8/09 at 08:23 PM

Twat the fanimould with a hammer to put a dent in it or slot the engine mount holes to move it forward>??


Canada EH! - 11/8/09 at 08:25 PM

Well it's out with the big ugly hammer and adjust the collector, or frame adjustment, or raise engine. IMHO you need at least 1 cm of space for engine movement in all directions.


mookaloid - 11/8/09 at 08:26 PM

that's gonna knock


zilspeed - 11/8/09 at 08:28 PM

See the first to responses for details.

Big hammer.

Or rework that top tube.
(Which looks a bit agricultural anyway.)


zilspeed - 11/8/09 at 08:28 PM

See the first two responses for details.

Big hammer.

Or rework that top tube.
(Which looks a bit agricultural anyway.)


zilspeed - 11/8/09 at 08:28 PM

See the first two responses for details.

Big hammer.

Or rework that top tube.
(Which looks a bit agricultural anyway.)


speedyxjs - 11/8/09 at 08:33 PM

Defo big hammer job

ETA - i see you still havnt eaten that kit cat

[Edited on 11-8-09 by speedyxjs]

[Edited on 12-8-09 by speedyxjs]


matt_claydon - 11/8/09 at 08:34 PM

The triangulation of the top tubes has already been lost by putting that U-shape cutout in, so why not just get rid of the problem sections?

Can't really see the point in the current cutout, it's no stronger/stiffer than the red option here:

Description
Description


[Edited on 11/8/09 by matt_claydon]


02GF74 - 11/8/09 at 08:47 PM

this a photo of the top part of the chassis - if anyone wishes to make suggestions - bearing in mnd the exhaust needs to fit and noting position of radiator which limits triangulation solutions. Rescued attachment DSC04424.JPG
Rescued attachment DSC04424.JPG


IanBrace - 11/8/09 at 08:47 PM

Angry grind that tube out!


nick205 - 11/8/09 at 08:53 PM

I'd rearrange the chasis tubes TBH - not the simplest option, but better than twatting the manifold about


SeaBass - 11/8/09 at 08:57 PM

Those tubes are doing nothing structurally. I'd just remove them and put a diagonal brace back towards the scuttle with a double tube down that side.

My mates F27 has loads of room in the engine bay with his crossflow. I thought the RV8 fitted in there too?


jase380 - 11/8/09 at 09:01 PM

as above . ., big hammer or grind rail off and weld it up


RichardK - 11/8/09 at 09:07 PM

My vote goes for, removing the tube and forget it was ever there

Regards

Rich


sminney - 11/8/09 at 10:43 PM

hopefully my art work will show below, but basically my vote would be to remove the whole diagonal and replace with a smaller one...... Rescued attachment chassis.jpg
Rescued attachment chassis.jpg


locoboy - 11/8/09 at 10:54 PM

alternatively just get a manifold that exits straight out the head and over the top chassis rail before it bends?


stifmeister - 11/8/09 at 11:01 PM

quote:
Originally posted by sminney
hopefully my art work will show below, but basically my vote would be to remove the whole diagonal and replace with a smaller one......


That would be the one I'd do. Had a similar experience with a narrow Westfield when I decided to put in a gear reduction starter, the gear thingy on the side of the main motor body hit the chassis in a big way. Just cut it and rewelded it in a different direction. You could smash the bejesus out of it but would you be pleased with that?


iscmatt - 11/8/09 at 11:42 PM

quote:
Originally posted by sminney
hopefully my art work will show below, but basically my vote would be to remove the whole diagonal and replace with a smaller one......


This certainly looks to be your best option


r1_pete - 12/8/09 at 07:37 AM

How about modding the rail like this: Rescued attachment o2gf.JPG
Rescued attachment o2gf.JPG


MikeRJ - 12/8/09 at 09:29 AM

The classic fix in this case is the Y brace:

Engine bay Y brace
Engine bay Y brace


The angle of the long part of the brace w.r.t the chassis rail should be made as wide as possible; there seems to be a fair bit of clearance between the outside of the collector and the chassis rail which should make this possible.


AndyW - 12/8/09 at 11:23 AM

whats the saying??? "measure twice, cut once"


02GF74 - 12/8/09 at 12:45 PM

quote:
Originally posted by AndyW
whats the saying??? "measure twice, cut once"


when I mocked up with a different head, there was about 10 mm or more clearance as well as the exahsut exiting centrally - it is a bit off there as well.


Angel Acevedo - 27/8/09 at 04:50 PM

Change the radiator to the other side of the traverse tube, you may want to modify your Thermostat housing so it exits toward the fronto of the car.
Then use the suggested solution above by MikeRJ