Board logo

How very odd !
02GF74 - 20/4/10 at 12:40 PM

balidey - 20/4/10 at 12:40 PM

are they mating?

speedyxjs - 20/4/10 at 12:41 PM

Obviously he couldnt get a bike tall enough for him?

02GF74 - 20/4/10 at 12:56 PM

hmmmm no one's commented on the poor exectuion?

the rear triangle on the top bike is contributing nothing but weight.

iank - 20/4/10 at 12:58 PM

quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74
hmmmm no one's commented on the poor exectuion?

the rear triangle on the top bike is contributing nothing but weight.


Surely that's the spare wheel carrier.

scootz - 20/4/10 at 12:58 PM

... I take it you never had one of these then!?

r1_pete - 20/4/10 at 01:07 PM

quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74
hmmmm no one's commented on the poor exectuion?

the rear triangle on the top bike is contributing nothing but weight.


Maybe going to extend them as wheelie bars....

Humbug - 20/4/10 at 01:53 PM

quote:
Originally posted by speedyxjs
Obviously he couldnt get a bike tall enough for him?


Don't think so, otherwise he would have left the pedals on the bottom crank instead of the top one

iscmatt - 20/4/10 at 01:55 PM

his legs will still be bent as much as if it were only 1 bike, i think he just wanted some elevation

MikeRJ - 20/4/10 at 02:10 PM

quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74
hmmmm no one's commented on the poor exectuion?

the rear triangle on the top bike is contributing nothing but weight.


How else you going to carry a passenger?

designer - 20/4/10 at 04:34 PM

Maybe he just has long legs.

clairetoo - 20/4/10 at 06:56 PM

Maybe there are a lot of deep puddles where lives ?

iti_uk - 22/4/10 at 11:40 AM

quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74 How very odd!


Indeed - you're right, what a fool using non-matching front and rear wheels...

...

...



[Edited on 22/4/2010 by iti_uk]

[Edited on 22/4/2010 by iti_uk]