Phil
Right, I'll try again - For some reason, this site changed my "poll options"!!
Hi All,
I'm doing a bit of R+D - Can you take part in the above Poll to tell me what size your exhaust can is please?
Feel free to make a comment on why yours is that size and why you chose that one ie noise etc.
And, I know this is asking a lot, but if yould also tell me the length of the can. that would help out a lot too!!!
TIA
Steve
Can't give you the diameter Steve but the length is 500mm. We bought it cos it's a straight through race can & sounds awesome IMO
Phil
Thanks Phil...
Do people see poll entries from 5" to 10", cos I only see 5" option - this is the second time this site's changed my poll 
First time I looked the options were 5-10", but now its 5 or 5 Steve Hignett
Phil
It was 5 or 5Mark Allanson a minute ago, so I deleted and started again...
Never mind, could everyone willing to take part please answer with Diameter of exhaust and length too if possible!
TIA
Steve
mines 5 lol
Mine is 10" but is a stainless one from a Passat 1.9 TDI - soon to be replaced by a GSXR1100 jobbie
Oh, and the poll is broken again
Hinty - try not putting any quotes in the poll; I'd guess it's messing up the site's code....
That's what I thought at first - I've deleted and tried again, but I don't think I can edit the poll options now though, can I?
Standardish R1 carbon type can (however big that is. Not much help am I??). 90 deg rolled end tail pipe welded on.
It was cheap and it does the job.
I just need two more to fit on the velocity stacks to quieten the induction noise and it will be bearable!
Assuming your R&D is about sound levels then I find that longer is better than fatter, but longer AND fatter is best.
The number of bends in the primaries has an effect too.
Cheers
Paul G
p.s. Haven't clicked the poll as I didn't see the point.
surely on a properly designed system its relative to the engine fitted/revs/peak torque and tube diameter?
Dont ask me about the above as I spent about 3 weeks doing the maths for mine
quote:
Originally posted by 907
Assuming your R&D is about sound levels then I find that longer is better than fatter, but longer AND fatter is best.
p.s. Haven't clicked the poll as I didn't see the point.
quote:
Originally posted by Franky
surely on a properly designed system its relative to the engine fitted/revs/peak torque and tube diameter?
Sorry, my mistake.
In that case, 115mm dia x 430mm long.
hth
Paul G
Thanks Paul, is that pretty standard to what you've been producing for people?
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Hignett
Thanks Paul, is that pretty standard to what you've been producing for people?