Board logo

Much cheaper petrol?
speedyxjs - 31/1/11 at 06:52 PM

Hydro-petrol. Maybe the solution?


blakep82 - 31/1/11 at 06:59 PM

"AA president Edmund King commented: 'The fact the hydrogen is cheaper now doesn't mean it always will be because the Government would soon get its hands on it and increase the tax."

he's hit the nail on the head there!

sounds awesome though, IF its true.... would it make all cars zero emission, therefore cheap road tax yeah right... lol

http://www.cellaenergy.com/index.php?page=technology

link to the company themselves^

[Edited on 31/1/11 by blakep82]


dinosaurjuice - 31/1/11 at 08:47 PM

the government employs so many people and pays so much interest on so much debt there is no way everyone can save money by changing fuel. the sad truth


scudderfish - 31/1/11 at 08:54 PM

But now you've sold the car speedy, you don't have to worry so much


scudderfish - 31/1/11 at 08:59 PM

It may be cheaper per litre, but I'd like to know what it does to your fuel consumption. My understanding is that hydrogen gas has a much lower energy density than petrol. It that gas is further diluted by embedding it in some sort of micro beads, then consumption is going to be worse.


Confused but excited. - 31/1/11 at 09:23 PM

What's the betting that OPEC buy the patents and you never hear of it again?


coozer - 31/1/11 at 09:26 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Confused but excited.
What's the betting that OPEC buy the patents and you never hear of it again?


Yep, same as the oil companys buying up GM's electric cars from the 90's. Oh, and the electric tram company and shutting it down..


JoelP - 31/1/11 at 09:29 PM

its no solution anyway, mankinds problem is sourcing energy sustainably. Basically we use far more energy than we realistically 'earn', all we are doing nowadays is borrowing stored energy from the past, in the form of oil. Once planet earth has no more in the bank to lend us, we are back to trying to actually harvest energy as fast as we need it - either nuclear/solar/tidal/wind. This article is really just about a way of moving energy about.


theduck - 31/1/11 at 09:49 PM

Something like this is whats needed, lets hope it works out! Then all we need to do is find a way to produce all of our electricity as green.


Benzine - 31/1/11 at 10:25 PM

quote:
Originally posted by JoelPBasically we use far more energy than we realistically 'earn', all we are doing nowadays is borrowing stored energy from the past, in the form of oil.


I watched a bbc documentary a few days ago and it mentioned mans fossil fuel usage being the equivilent of 22 billion slaves working 24 hours a day


JoelP - 3/2/11 at 09:21 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Benzine
quote:
Originally posted by JoelPBasically we use far more energy than we realistically 'earn', all we are doing nowadays is borrowing stored energy from the past, in the form of oil.


I watched a bbc documentary a few days ago and it mentioned mans fossil fuel usage being the equivilent of 22 billion slaves working 24 hours a day


I feel like one of them sometimes


Benzine - 3/2/11 at 10:08 PM


Ninehigh - 4/2/11 at 09:22 PM

I say bring it on. What's the rate of tax the "goverment" steal? 65%? Let them! Let Cella rake it in by selling it for 30p at the pump, then add the bit for their cigars and brandy and we'll still be laughing. If they start taking the Michael with the tax then they can sell machines that make it at home and they can only tax the machine


carpmart - 4/2/11 at 09:31 PM

22 Billion slaves would create a LOT of greenhouse gases!