Found an interesting connundrum. Got two mechanical boost gauges which read within 1.5psi of each other, but when reviewing EFI logs (MS) I see a
fairly large difference. The mech gauges give me 0.95 of boost (13.8psi), the MS logs give me a peak of 176kpa (11psi).
I'm inclined to accept the MS logs more than the 10 year old mechanical gauges, what do folks think. Anyone else noticed such disparity?
Absolute or gauge pressure?
Gauge (Ok the 176kpa is absolute but I've converted it to gauge psi for ya! )
Dunno.. EVU gets input from the MAP sensor These can be great OR crap.
Mech gauges ? Ditto I use a Warranteed 2% accurate boost gauge from Mc Master Carr ~$20 too Compared to one (most?) of the aftermarket Bodge
Gauges.. this thing is like an Atomic clock for accuracy .
Before you can go pointing accusing fingers at the existing hardware.. you... Really! ...need to test with a genuinely Trustworthy gauge.
Calibrate the gauge yourself. 10m head of water is 14.2 psi.
Set up gauge attached to Hosepipe filled with water, vertically that is, and drop height of top of hosepipe until reading on gauge matches previous
ones. Pro rata to 10m head to get true value. Google for other stuff to ensure accuracy. Bingo!
Cheers!
Like others above I would question the sensor that is sending the signal to ms as much as a a mechanical gauge. You need to calibrate the mech one or you will never be sure.
As above, you have to check as you have no way of knowing.
Although it does depend how old you are. Most younger generation automatically believe anything digital or electronic must be better or more
accurate.
The number of times I am told my speedo is out because the GPS in their phone says it is. How do they know?
Digital calipers are 'more accurate' then my dial vernier.
etc.
What does the MS gauge read in normal air? should be about 99kpa, but depends on your altitude and climatic conditions on the day.
I assume they get their pressure feeds from the same place (before and after intercooler can give you the kind of drop that you describe).
Personally I don't trust mechanical gauges any more. In turbo applications they can struggle because of the fluctuating pressure, are either of
them liquid filled.
It is possible that they are both 'accurate' but the sampling rate of the digital one might reveal stuff that the hysteresis loop on the
mechanical gauge might be masking.
just thought I'd chuck that one in
quote:
Calibrate the gauge yourself. 10m head of water is 14.2 psi. Set up gauge attached to Hosepipe filled with water, vertically that is, and drop height of top of hosepipe until reading on gauge matches previous ones. Pro rata to 10m head to get true value. Google for other stuff to ensure accuracy. Bingo! Cheers!
quote:
Originally posted by coyoteboy
Bah, I'm going to have to go down the route of trusting no-one and calibrating aren't I. Damnit.
No
Boost profile from a light throttle press showing 0.95bar on the mech gauge...
https://www.dropbox.com/s/t069p9psppsznzw/boost.png
i have the same with my map sensor on the ecu reading lower than the boost controller does, i take the map as correct as that what the engines fuels for
It poses quite a risk though, if conventional wisdom suggests x psi is sensible max.
In my case I really am questioning the ms too because it's significantly more powerful than stock yet using only 60% duty on the n injectors too.
A world of questions!