Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: This looks like a ringer
whitestu

posted on 30/9/10 at 12:34 PM Reply With Quote
This looks like a ringer

PH Link

A Dutton Sierra was a 4x4 lookalike.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
omega0684

posted on 30/9/10 at 12:37 PM Reply With Quote

quote:

its got a 2L pinto with the cylinder head "all done up" with twin 40s on the side.


"all done up" PMSL!





I love Pinto's, even if i did get mine from P&O!

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
owelly

posted on 30/9/10 at 01:10 PM Reply With Quote
Built in 2000 but reg'd in 1968? It will be tax free if you want to try and defraud the tax man. That's a civil offence that will put you behind bars.....
After my two run-ins with these sort of ringers, I can confirm that it's not worth the hassle! It was OK for me because I was on the right side of the law and bought the correct cars with no ID and then applied for the V5s. It was'nt much fun for the other poor suckers who bought the ringers (or just the documents) who got nothing for their money, or the guys who sold the ringed cars/V5. They got a court appearance and one got a 6 month suspended sentence.....





http://www.ppcmag.co.uk

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
lotusmadandy

posted on 30/9/10 at 01:12 PM Reply With Quote
Yup defo looks like a ringer to me.
Add to the asking price the cost of putting it through iva and registering/taxing
It ain't so cheap.

One to avoid.me think's.

Andy






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
BenB

posted on 30/9/10 at 01:14 PM Reply With Quote
Very strange. the dutton sierra was a fugly 4*4 and as said it can't be tax exempt if it was built when it says it was.

I suspect someone registered a dutton sierra on a 1968 VIN then sold that identity on to make a Seven.

Doubly illegal

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 30/9/10 at 03:13 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BenB
Very strange. the dutton sierra was a fugly 4*4 and as said it can't be tax exempt if it was built when it says it was.


Dutton Sierra was not 4x4, I was looking at one the other day and it had an Escort back axle. It did look a bit like a Lada Niva though and some have been modified to run Suzuki Samurai running gear. It's a bit blatant but he's obviously got away with it so far defrauding tax and insurance alike.





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
speedyxjs

posted on 30/9/10 at 03:46 PM Reply With Quote
Looks like its been pulled now





How long can i resist the temptation to drop a V8 in?

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
jossey

posted on 30/9/10 at 04:19 PM Reply With Quote
ohhh poo its gone.

did anyone get the pics from it before it went?


dave j

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.