Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: First VW, now Renault?
David Jenkins

posted on 14/1/16 at 06:31 PM Reply With Quote
First VW, now Renault?

BBC News






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
ReMan

posted on 14/1/16 at 08:57 PM Reply With Quote
Whats the smiley for "not too surprised" ?





www.plusnine.co.uk
∙،°. ˘Ô≈ôﺣ

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
tegwin

posted on 14/1/16 at 10:42 PM Reply With Quote
All of the manufacturers must be doing something similar to VW.....Im not surprised renault is..


I have a question though... To help reduce emissions on startup a lot of diesel engines have additional heater units fueled by diesel.... Do the combustion gasses from these heaters play a part in the overall readings?





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would the last person who leaves the country please switch off the lights and close the door!

www.verticalhorizonsmedia.tv

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 15/1/16 at 08:44 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by tegwin
All of the manufacturers must be doing something similar to VW.....Im not surprised renault is..


I have a question though... To help reduce emissions on startup a lot of diesel engines have additional heater units fueled by diesel.... Do the combustion gasses from these heaters play a part in the overall readings?


Good question! I happen to know that our 2001 Y plate Alhambra had a diesel powered heater to help warm the interior of the vehicle before the engine warmed up. In our case it was disconnected as it didn't work, but having looked at it to see if I could fix it I can advise it had it's own exhaust pipe so I'm guessing the emissions were not part of the engine test results.

I believe my 57 plate Passat also has a diesel powered heater unit - given VW (and it will be others) record here I'd hazard a guess that emissions were directed elsewhere for any test.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 15/1/16 at 08:47 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by tegwin
All of the manufacturers must be doing something similar to VW.....Im not surprised renault is..


I have a question though... To help reduce emissions on startup a lot of diesel engines have additional heater units fueled by diesel.... Do the combustion gasses from these heaters play a part in the overall readings?



Agreed, they will all have been doing it otherwise VW would have been caught sooner!

VAG by all accounts have a lead on TDI type engines so they were likely to get hit hard by it, but they will all have been up to no good.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 15/1/16 at 09:42 AM Reply With Quote
One other thing to add on my part here...

I've driven TDIs for many years and whilst they're not the last word in refinement or power delivery for daily drives they're hard to beat. Reliable, pokey, light on fuel when driven right and generally I like them.

My favourite it has to be said was a Seat Leon TDI PD150bhp - fast car, good to drive and peaked at close to 70mpg on a drive from Stockport to Winchester (slipstreaming an HGV). Other than that a pair 138bhp Passat estates have also been more than adequate if not fast transport - huge boot space too!

SWMBO now has a Touran (Golf based I believe) which seems very good too. Only a 1.9TDI 105bhp, but moves well and swallows a large load too.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 15/1/16 at 02:18 PM Reply With Quote
I would also add that I had a Volvo V50 1.6 diesel for a while. Shamefully bad car (sad as I still think it's a great looking car from the outside), but it did perform well economy wise.

One nice trick was changing the Volvo lettering on the boot to read ovloV, which raised a few smiles in the rear view mirror.


Volvo (probably hampered by Ford) chose to make a little storage tray, but located it behind the dashboard fascia panel. Shame as the dash looked OK, just hampered by a daft storage tray.

[Edited on 15/1/16 by nick205]






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 15/1/16 at 05:12 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by nick205
One other thing to add on my part here...

I've driven TDIs for many years and whilst they're not the last word in refinement or power delivery for daily drives they're hard to beat. Reliable, pokey, light on fuel when driven right and generally I like them.

My favourite it has to be said was a Seat Leon TDI PD150bhp - fast car, good to drive and peaked at close to 70mpg on a drive from Stockport to Winchester (slipstreaming an HGV). Other than that a pair 138bhp Passat estates have also been more than adequate if not fast transport - huge boot space too!

SWMBO now has a Touran (Golf based I believe) which seems very good too. Only a 1.9TDI 105bhp, but moves well and swallows a large load too.


A petrol car of similar size will return similar MPG in similar circumstances.
It is in stop start traffic diesel pays off because diesel aren't throttled allowing much better volumetric efficiency. A idling diesel engine burns very little fuel compared to a petrol engine.

Because of the higher carbon content DERV is about 20 percent more dense than petrol hence some of the savings of running a diesel are due to measuring fuel consumption in units of volume / distance not mass /distance.

It would do the environment much benefit to adjust the tax regime to reflect the higher carbon content and swing the balance back in favour of petrol enginesfor cars.





[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
daviep

posted on 15/1/16 at 08:03 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by nick205
moves well and swallows a large load too.


Mines not so well behaved





“A truly great library contains something in it to offend everyone.”

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Adamirish

posted on 15/1/16 at 08:12 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by daviep
quote:
Originally posted by nick205
moves well and swallows a large load too.


Mines not so well behaved




I see what you did there!





MK Indy 1700 Xflow

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 18/1/16 at 05:14 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Adamirish
quote:
Originally posted by daviep
quote:
Originally posted by nick205
moves well and swallows a large load too.


Mines not so well behaved




I see what you did there!



Hehehe - had to read it twice, but worthy of a chuckle!






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
phelpsa

posted on 18/1/16 at 06:19 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
quote:
Originally posted by nick205
One other thing to add on my part here...

I've driven TDIs for many years and whilst they're not the last word in refinement or power delivery for daily drives they're hard to beat. Reliable, pokey, light on fuel when driven right and generally I like them.

My favourite it has to be said was a Seat Leon TDI PD150bhp - fast car, good to drive and peaked at close to 70mpg on a drive from Stockport to Winchester (slipstreaming an HGV). Other than that a pair 138bhp Passat estates have also been more than adequate if not fast transport - huge boot space too!

SWMBO now has a Touran (Golf based I believe) which seems very good too. Only a 1.9TDI 105bhp, but moves well and swallows a large load too.


A petrol car of similar size will return similar MPG in similar circumstances.
It is in stop start traffic diesel pays off because diesel aren't throttled allowing much better volumetric efficiency. A idling diesel engine burns very little fuel compared to a petrol engine.

Because of the higher carbon content DERV is about 20 percent more dense than petrol hence some of the savings of running a diesel are due to measuring fuel consumption in units of volume / distance not mass /distance.

It would do the environment much benefit to adjust the tax regime to reflect the higher carbon content and swing the balance back in favour of petrol enginesfor cars.


This post is not particularly accurate.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
David Jenkins

posted on 19/1/16 at 04:23 PM Reply With Quote
And so it goes on...

Renault recall






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 19/1/16 at 04:37 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by phelpsa
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
quote:
Originally posted by nick205
One other thing to add on my part here...

I've driven TDIs for many years and whilst they're not the last word in refinement or power delivery for daily drives they're hard to beat. Reliable, pokey, light on fuel when driven right and generally I like them.

My favourite it has to be said was a Seat Leon TDI PD150bhp - fast car, good to drive and peaked at close to 70mpg on a drive from Stockport to Winchester (slipstreaming an HGV). Other than that a pair 138bhp Passat estates have also been more than adequate if not fast transport - huge boot space too!

SWMBO now has a Touran (Golf based I believe) which seems very good too. Only a 1.9TDI 105bhp, but moves well and swallows a large load too.


A petrol car of similar size will return similar MPG in similar circumstances.
It is in stop start traffic diesel pays off because diesel aren't throttled allowing much better volumetric efficiency. A idling diesel engine burns very little fuel compared to a petrol engine.

Because of the higher carbon content DERV is about 20 percent more dense than petrol hence some of the savings of running a diesel are due to measuring fuel consumption in units of volume / distance not mass /distance.

It would do the environment much benefit to adjust the tax regime to reflect the higher carbon content and swing the balance back in favour of petrol enginesfor cars.


This post is not particularly accurate.




It strikes me that petrol has fallen out of vogue and diesel has been on catch up technology wise - IIRC it's not that long since people got excited about common rail injection on diesel engines when petrol has been done that way for a long time. Personally I like a diesel engine and the rattle noise is largely under control now.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.