Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: have we discussed ....
02GF74

posted on 30/3/16 at 08:52 PM Reply With Quote
have we discussed ....

Duke engines?
http://vid.carbuzz.com/its-about-time-someone-improved-on-the-combustion-engine/?utm_source=311






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 30/3/16 at 09:53 PM Reply With Quote
Looks like the inside of a Sanden A/C compressor to me
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
NigeEss

posted on 30/3/16 at 11:58 PM Reply With Quote
Duke first used their engine in a car in 1993, 23 years later there's not much progress.





Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.................Douglas Adams.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
scudderfish

posted on 31/3/16 at 05:41 AM Reply With Quote
How does it seal the spinning block to the stationary head?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 31/3/16 at 06:54 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by scudderfish
How does it seal the spinning block to the stationary head?


Most of these alternative internal combustion engine designs have tricky sealing problems, one of the reasons they tend to get nowhere.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ugg10

posted on 31/3/16 at 07:44 AM Reply With Quote
Some other different engines here - http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=200120

I oarticukarly like the CEM engine, as already said, needs something novel in the sealing department, also has a lot of rotating mass, not good for throttle response.

http://www.epindustries.com/cemco.html





---------------------------------------------------------------
1968 Ford Anglia 105e, 1.7 Zetec SE, Mk2 Escort Workd Cup front end, 5 link rear
Build Blog - http://Anglia1968.weebly.com

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 31/3/16 at 08:13 AM Reply With Quote
It looks overly complicated to my untrained eyes. Particularly when straight 4 bangers are so cheap and easy to use.

I drove a colleagues Mazda RX8 with the rotary engine. It was quick enough, but really didn't have the whoosh factor I expected it to have. I like the fact many have gone bang and people are playing with fitting other engines. There's a guy on here fitting an Audi 4 pot petrol turbo to one and it looks a good project to me.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Camber Dave

posted on 1/4/16 at 07:17 AM Reply With Quote
Over 20 years ago I saw a prototype Aero engine in the Bristol Industrial Museum using the same principle.

From memory it had 7 cylinders and sleeve valves.

It didn't go into production.

Obviously I remembered it and thought it worthy of development.

[Edited on 1/4/16 by Camber Dave]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.