Dan.
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 05:39 PM |
|
|
Non Locost engine transplant
http://www.ecarlist.com/showroom/1308/photos/116092
Impressive work.... but even I beg to ask the question... Why?
|
|
|
bartonp
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 05:43 PM |
|
|
I wouldn't fancy any of the rear susp loads being fed into the middle of that long roll cage tube (top)... (yes I know that's not all
that's holding it, but...)
|
|
carpmart
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 05:54 PM |
|
|
Why?
You only live once - make the most of it!
Radical Clubsport, Kwaker motor
'94 MX5 MK1, 1.8
F10 M5 - 600bhp Daily Hack
Range Rover Sport - Wife's Car
Mercedes A class - Son's Car
|
|
iscmatt
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 05:55 PM |
|
|
That rear end is AWFUL! why didn't they use the original and intergrate some neat vents for cooling. Other than the rear end i think it cool,
but that back end !!!!!
|
|
02GF74
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 05:55 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dan.
Impressive work.... but even I beg to ask the question... Why?
why?
to create luggage space under the bonnet.
obvious I would have thought.
|
|
bartonp
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 06:00 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by carpmart
Why?
'Cos the top of the coilover mount will flap about making a 'boing' noise and varying the spring rate?
(did i answer the wrong question? )
[Edited on 11/2/10 by bartonp]
|
|
Wadders
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 06:45 PM |
|
|
Why on earth would anyone pull the motor out of a mint lambo and stick it in a mustang.
Could maybe of understood it if the lambo was
a write off.
weird weird weird
Al.
|
|
steve m
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 07:08 PM |
|
|
to much money on tap ??
|
|
bob tatt
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 07:10 PM |
|
|
what a total waste of time and money in my opinion and the arse is as ugly as sin to boot.
|
|
Werner Van Loock
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 07:14 PM |
|
|
americans, pff
http://www.clubstylus.be
|
|
MikeRJ
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 07:46 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Wadders
Why on earth would anyone pull the motor out of a mint lambo and stick it in a mustang.
Could maybe of understood it if the lambo was
a write off.
weird weird weird
Al.
I totally agree, I was looking to see if the Lambo had been damaged but looks ok in the pics.
|
|
55ant
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 08:01 PM |
|
|
not entirely sure why i dont like it? but i dont. yep the arse end looks a bit like those silly japanese cars with the huge splitters, much more
intersting things to squeeze a lambo engine into, or, leave it in the lambo! carbon fibre looks chipped or drilled wrong??????????? like the front
though,
away from cars, now cycling and building TT bikes
|
|
David Jenkins
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 08:06 PM |
|
|
It must have taken a lot of skill, hard work and money to create that car...
...what a pity.
|
|
Simon
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 08:40 PM |
|
|
Take one american car that doesn't handle and chuck an overrated volkswagen engine in the back. Kind of reminds me of some earlier american
classic that exploded quite a lot or the other that rolled over quite readily.
I'd have preferred them to stick a decent engine (for eg the LS7) in the mustang.
Quite utterly pointless in my book (and that rear is crap).
ATB
Simon
|
|
turboben
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 09:01 PM |
|
|
I thought the one thing Americans are really good at is engines - this is the wrong way round!
|
|
Ben_Copeland
|
posted on 11/2/10 at 09:06 PM |
|
|
Dont like the back, but i think it looks well done. Why do it??? Just because they can !!!
Ben
Locost Map on Google Maps
Z20LET Astra Turbo, into a Haynes
Roadster
Enter Your Details Here
http://www.facebook.com/EquinoxProducts for all your bodywork needs!
|
|
morcus
|
posted on 12/2/10 at 01:45 AM |
|
|
I was under the impression most of whats under the skin is Lambo. I like it, even though it is backwards, everyone knows your meant have the body of
your sports car designed by italians and get your engine from Yankees.
In a White Room, With Black Curtains, By the Station.
|
|
bartonp
|
posted on 12/2/10 at 10:48 AM |
|
|
Did they also put the 'stang engine in the Lambo perhaps?
|
|