Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Cameras back on....
tegwin

posted on 1/4/11 at 11:30 AM Reply With Quote
Cameras back on....

Well that didnt last long did it... speed cameras back on in Oxfordshire

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-12928747

Interesting statistics there...lol





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would the last person who leaves the country please switch off the lights and close the door!

www.verticalhorizonsmedia.tv

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Daddylonglegs

posted on 1/4/11 at 11:50 AM Reply With Quote
Didn't take them long to realise how much money they were going to lose....sorry, I meant how much safer it is with them switched on





It looks like the Midget is winning at the moment......

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ben_Copeland

posted on 1/4/11 at 11:50 AM Reply With Quote
News this morning said a load more cameras were going OFF!





Ben

Locost Map on Google Maps


Z20LET Astra Turbo, into a Haynes Roadster

Enter Your Details Here
http://www.facebook.com/EquinoxProducts for all your bodywork needs!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
speedyxjs

posted on 1/4/11 at 11:55 AM Reply With Quote
Its a bit inconclusive isnt it? Especially as there were actually less accidents in total on the roads of oxfordshire while the cameras were off!





How long can i resist the temptation to drop a V8 in?

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
flange nut

posted on 1/4/11 at 12:05 PM Reply With Quote
Yes and how many of the accidents involved excessive speed?

Geoff

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
vinny1275

posted on 1/4/11 at 12:10 PM Reply With Quote
The statistics are completely misleadnig (surprise, surprise) - I read a brilliant piece about this in the register (I think, might have been pistonheads tho) a year or so ago - accident rates have been on an upward trend for a number of years, across camera and non-camera sites (indicating that cameras have no effect at all on the number of accidents) and serious injury rates has been taking a downward trend as cars become better able to protect their occupants. Any six-month snapshot is quite likely to be a statistical anomaly in the overall trend - as the 6 month period they've chosen included the 1st half of winter, perhaps the weather that year was worse than the folowing year or vice versa, affecting the accident rates. They also don't take into account any change in the number of journeys taken - if there was a 10% rise in accidents, what's to say there wasn't also a 10% rise in cars on the road?






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
tegwin

posted on 1/4/11 at 12:20 PM Reply With Quote
Is this a really weird april fools joke.>?





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would the last person who leaves the country please switch off the lights and close the door!

www.verticalhorizonsmedia.tv

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
hughpinder

posted on 1/4/11 at 12:49 PM Reply With Quote
From the national statistics office bare figures:

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=1208

Basically car and passenger deaths dropped 5% pa every year from the mid 50s to 1990, then sharp drop 1990/92 then flat. Pedestrian deaths have dropped consistantly.

for in depth analysis see:
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/effects.html

Hugh

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 1/4/11 at 01:33 PM Reply With Quote
quote:

Police said since then deaths and serious injuries on the roads had increased



quote:

in the six months after they were switched off there were 70 slight injuries, 13 serious injuries and no fatalities



quote:

In the same period the year before there were 55 slight injuries, 13 serious injuries and no fatalities



Maths was never my strong point, but I make that no change in either deaths or serious injuries in areas covered by cameras. Are the police suggesting that after the well publicised switch off last year, peoples driving became worse only at non-camera sites? Seems very unlikely.

It's completely ridiculous comparing two single intervals like that anyway, regression to the mean causes any anomalies in one period to look much worse, when they may average out the same or better over a useful time period. In fact this serves as much stronger proof that the cameras have no effect on death rate, which is hardly a surprise. The spin doctors continue to ply their trade however...


[Edited on 1/4/11 by MikeRJ]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ninehigh

posted on 1/4/11 at 04:25 PM Reply With Quote
They do realise that a slight injury could be a half-cut bloke on a pushbike falling into the grass verge and cutting his arm on a bramble?






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Daddylonglegs

posted on 1/4/11 at 05:02 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by hughpinder
Pedestrian deaths have dropped consistantly.
Hugh


I think you'll find that's Natural selection





It looks like the Midget is winning at the moment......

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.