After 2 years i have decided the sump on my MK pinto is too low, i can never go on a trip without scraping it on the ground somewhere. I have finally
worn through the metal on the bottom near the filler cap and have a nice little puddle of oil on the garage floor. I have temporarily patched the hole
with some liquid metal stuff!
Now, my first question is for those with a pinto and a type 9 box, have you bolted the gearbox support bracket on top of or underneath the chassis
brackets? my box is currently sitting on top though i'm wondering if i change it so that it hangs from it rather than sits on it and that the
engine and gearbox will pivot slightly bringing the front of the sump up a little higher (the front of the sump being the current lowest point of the
car by a good inch lower than the bottom of the bellhousing) I would think some high tensile bolts would be able to deal with holding the gearbox
ok?
Also does anybody know if mk have made a sump that can offer more ground clearance for a pinto? i got mine from them 3 years ago, didnt know if they
had changed their design? I'm thinking that it must be possible to re-design the sump to make it shallower yet wider to keep the same capacity?
the math shouldn't be too complicated.
Also i can't heighten the whole engine as the top of the engine (oil filler cap) already rubs (leaves a small mark) on the underside of the
bonnet and i'm not wanting to add a scoop.
Oh and i'm not getting a dry sump either!
I will be making a sump guard as well at some point but want to get the sump as high as possible first.
Pinto sump advice and what you have done all welcomed
if you've got welding gear, you could always alter the oil filler, cut off the standard filler, weld plate in it's place and make a smaller filler plug on the back end of the rocker cover
Have you shortened you sump?
That would be the place to start imho
yes it was shortened by mk from the start
Is the sump at the same level as the bottom of the bellhousing?
quote:
Originally posted by flak monkey
Is the sump at the same level as the bottom of the bellhousing?
quote:
Originally posted by iscmatt
quote:
Originally posted by flak monkey
Is the sump at the same level as the bottom of the bellhousing?
No, it is about an inch lower, the whole of the underneath of the engine and gearbox is sloped towards the front
On my old westfield I fitted an RS2000 alloy sump. That was much shorter than the standard tin sump and had an extra wing to keep the capacity:
ebay link
If the sump really is an inch lower than the bellhousing (at the back) then it wasnt shortened enough. If it is just an inch lower at the front
because your engine is tipped forward then there is your problem.
You may find it is tipped forward to clear the bonnet or nose cone, so check that before going any further.
All I did with mine is cut the bottom off and weld a bit of plate over it. Didnt increase the capacity and have never had any oil surge problems
whatsoever.
David
As Garyo says, get an RS sump, its alloy and gives sufficent clearance. If you do make sure you get the pick up pipe and dip stick too.
quote:
Originally posted by SteveWalker
quote:
Originally posted by iscmatt
quote:
Originally posted by flak monkey
Is the sump at the same level as the bottom of the bellhousing?
No, it is about an inch lower, the whole of the underneath of the engine and gearbox is sloped towards the front
If it wasn't sloped would the sump still be lower than the bellhousing?
My thoughts..
1. Jack the engine mounting up to lift the engine. As long as its within the body..
2. A sump skid.. 2 ways.. A canny thick metal guard mounted on the front of the chassis, folded to cover the sump... or, some bits of wood strapped
under the chassis rails lower than the sump to act as skids.
All you need is your sump to NOT be the lowest point.
Steve
bump
Have you seen/compared the sump modifications given in ChrisG's book?
Not sure if that's better or worse than what you have.
Can you raise the engine a 1/2 an inch on the mounts? It doesn't need to be moved up much if it's catching but hasn't wrecked the
mounts yet.
Finally is it catching because the front dips down on heavy braking? If so, slightly harder springs might sort out the problem.