Board logo

Thieving lying b@st@rds
macspeedy - 2/7/08 at 12:04 PM

Just got an email from paypal saying there has been a charge back made against my account from may 2008, somehow they say the buyers card was used without there knowledge!!

So they take the money first since its the credit card company. (not happy)

Luckily i sent it recorded delivery, so i have proof of receipt.

Just got to wait and see

So i suppose the moral of the story is send things recorded delivery otherwise i wouldn't have a leg to stand on.

[Edited on 2/7/08 by macspeedy]


SeaBass - 2/7/08 at 12:06 PM

Sounds like Paypal alright...


macspeedy - 2/7/08 at 12:24 PM

paypal dont have any control over it the creditcard company come in and say right thats mine and thats it. paypal will fight the case for you if you can provide proof of postage etc..


Paul TigerB6 - 2/7/08 at 12:36 PM

quote:
Originally posted by macspeedy
paypal dont have any control over it the creditcard company come in and say right thats mine and thats it. paypal will fight the case for you if you can provide proof of postage etc..


I'm not too confident Paypal will fight your corner too hard having seen several recent posts unfortunately. Really hope they do though but i've lost most of my confidence in them


Mr G - 2/7/08 at 12:45 PM

As soon as I saw the topic title I knew it was going to be about paypal.

Proof of reciept appears to mean jack $hit it seems as Mr Isons found out


Fatgadget - 2/7/08 at 01:11 PM

Paypal sucks


macspeedy - 2/7/08 at 01:20 PM

just noticed the delivery address is london but the guys address is ayrshire?? wtf...

[Edited on 2/7/08 by macspeedy]


stevebubs - 2/7/08 at 02:12 PM

I'm really surprised that some "no win, no fee" lawyer hasn't picked up on this scam so far and started procedings against Paypal for theft/fraud...


Fatgadget - 2/7/08 at 02:38 PM

quote:
Originally posted by stevebubs
I'm really surprised that some "no win, no fee" lawyer hasn't picked up on this scam so far and started procedings against Paypal for theft/fraud...


Paypal is part of Ebay...It has huge muscles..Also makes you wonder why the 2 entities are kept separate when in fact they are one and the same.

Incidentally I read somewhere that Ebay got clobbered for £30 mill for some indiscretion...Something to do with dodgy goods being sold on the site LOL!




[Edited on 2/7/08 by Fatgadget]


Peteff - 3/7/08 at 07:58 AM

They prosecuted the French ebay for failing to do enough to prevent sales of counterfeit goods from LVMH link


saigonij - 3/7/08 at 09:22 AM

anyone know how to cancel your paypal subscription?


mangogrooveworkshop - 20/11/08 at 06:53 PM

there is justice some times


Jon Ison - 20/11/08 at 07:14 PM

You wont win this one I'm afraid, and this is from someone who fought with them for five months to win one battle with them.

They will just keep reverting to "the credit card company as initiated the charge back" not them.

Trouble is THEY, paypal allegedly verify card details address ect but pass on the costs of their inadequacies to you the seller.

IO did have a long battle with them over a charge back, know what their general response was ? "We should build into the cost of items enough to cover charge backs as they will happen"

As I said above, its very annoying, if we had taken the card payment over the phone fair enough, our problem, our fault, but paypal took the payment on our/your behalf, we/you paid them commission to do so, they should carry the risk of cards THEY verify, not us/you the seller.

Stinks but you wont win this one.


02GF74 - 27/11/08 at 02:19 PM

quote:
Originally posted by mangogrooveworkshop
there is justice some times


I disagree. It don't believe it is ebay's responsibility to police listing to determine which are fakes, stolen etc. It it the people wh are selling/advertising the fake items that should have been fined.how many unroadworthy or stolen cars have been sold via Autotraders - do they get fined? Not that I heard of so why pick on ebay?

The result was ebay users would be charged a bit more to recover the costs.

So if the same was done with a newspaper, would it be the newspapers fault?

[Edited on 27/11/08 by 02GF74]