Board logo

royal blackmail attempt
thunderace - 29/10/07 at 01:18 PM

who know who it is ?


blakep82 - 29/10/07 at 01:19 PM

i'm taking a guess at prince andrew, or harry


David Jenkins - 29/10/07 at 01:20 PM

The palace spokesman did say "not a senior royal", allegedly.


graememk - 29/10/07 at 01:20 PM

maybe someone has photos of them dressed as hitler ?


speedyxjs - 29/10/07 at 01:24 PM

I think it was the Queen
Not really, havent a clue


nick205 - 29/10/07 at 01:44 PM

My question is do I really care who it was or what they were "allegedly" up to?

My answer is no


mookaloid - 29/10/07 at 01:56 PM

I don't want to know.

If some one has been a victim of blackmail, (Royal or not) then if their name is released the blackmailer wins - or more to the point the victim loses.




wilkingj - 29/10/07 at 02:01 PM

It all depends on whether its true or not. ie what they have allegedly done is really what happend or not.

You WONT find out the truth, as it will be covered up or diluted etc etc.

Same with Diana, Its 10 years on, and they have only juts got round to an inquest.

Its like the report on the Dunblane killings, the Internal police report is said to have a 100 year disclosure ban on it. Whats in it that we must not see, or know?

Anything the authorities DONT want you to hear, then will make it very very difficult to get at the truth.

Remember.... The TRUTH is out there!...

(Hums).... Doo dee dlddly dooo

Ah... the little green men are coming to take me away!


blakep82 - 29/10/07 at 02:05 PM

^ is there not supposed to be some disclsure ban on something prince phillip is suppose dto have done years ago (i forget how many, 40 or something) which is coming to an end soon?


wilkingj - 29/10/07 at 02:07 PM

Thought:

What if its true... Like one of the younsters, had a spliff, then shagged some lass (or even a bloke).

Why is it such headline news? It happens most nights in most major Cities in the UK.

Poor royals cant have a real life like the rest of us. They can't even fart without someone reporting it to the press.

No exciting sex in the park, a field or the back of a car for them. They miss out on a lot really!

Glad I'm not one. (a royal that is!)


Volvorsport - 29/10/07 at 02:32 PM

i think id have a go on kate tho !!


blakep82 - 29/10/07 at 02:34 PM

kate who? kate middleton?

hell yeah, she's hot, i'd have a go on her too

[Edited on 29/10/07 by blakep82]


Confused but excited. - 29/10/07 at 04:25 PM

If they didn't do it on/in a seven, who gives a sh1t?


Grimsdale - 29/10/07 at 08:47 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Confused but excited.
If they didn't do it on/in a seven, who gives a sh1t?


Amen!!! that is very true!


Mag1caltrev0r - 30/10/07 at 08:35 PM

A bit of a dodgy area here. The forum owners could get into trouble if they were to leave the name of the person on here.

it's fairly easily found with the power of Google

... I found it


iank - 30/10/07 at 09:31 PM

Since it's been all over fox news he will apparently be making a public statement soon.

As for 'minor' royal he's certainly a known name.


jack trolley - 31/10/07 at 06:59 PM


britishtrident - 31/10/07 at 07:29 PM

They got one of the younger "rent a Kents" to take the blame. Word is somebody a great deal nearer Chucky , had to be or Buck house would have been involved.

Other thing is heterosexual sex wouldn't raise many eyebrows the royal family have been having it off with the peasants for centuries.

My bet is Max Mosley is behind to divert attention from him.

Windsors should stick to shooting rare birds