Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: Locost as a recognised Car Make
Kitlooney1000

posted on 13/2/04 at 09:10 PM Reply With Quote
Locost as a recognised Car Make

Who thinks Locost should be a Brand Name the Same as W*stf**ld, M*rg*n, and Cateringvan.
When you search for Locost on a Auto trader or the Likes, nothing shows( apart from EBAY). It should be a brand name, its been on the market long enough

[Edited on 13/2/04 by Kitlooney1000]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Hellfire

posted on 13/2/04 at 10:39 PM Reply With Quote
Hmmm

Although I agree in principal, I disagree generally as it is pretty much a generic term. As such, by definition, it cant be a Car Make... or Brand.

Now if you said MK then that would be a different matter...






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
greggors84

posted on 14/2/04 at 11:34 PM Reply With Quote
But surely they are all made my different people and unlikley to ever be the same, therefore it cant really be a car make. Also you would never be able to think oh its a locost, it must be good, as it could be a big pile of shite.





Chris

The Magnificent 7!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Graceland

posted on 15/2/04 at 09:26 AM Reply With Quote
disagree with making it a brand name - why? there would simply be to many differant variants to warrant a uniformed convention which other car manufacturers have.

just my 6p worth there






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
stephen_gusterson

posted on 15/2/04 at 11:04 AM Reply With Quote
i have spent yonks making a car thats different and not from a kit.

I dont want it lumped in with others.

I have a suspicion that few cars on here are what I woudl truly call locosts.

In my view its not just the price - its the total DIY concept.

For me, if you are building an MK, Luego, ST or whatever, its not a true 'ron champion locost'.

But then neither is the bastard child of it that im building a 'ronnie' of low priced - but it is a 98% diy jobbie.

hands up who is doing or has done a real scratch build? see poll!!!!!


atb

steve






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
chrisg

posted on 15/2/04 at 11:39 AM Reply With Quote
*Sticks hand up*

I even made my own shocks.

Cheers

Chris





Note to all: I really don't know when to leave well alone. I tried to get clever with the mods, then when they gave me a lifeline to see the error of my ways, I tried to incite more trouble via u2u. So now I'm banned, never to return again. They should have done it years ago!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Graceland

posted on 15/2/04 at 12:52 PM Reply With Quote
*raises hand* genuine locost build here with much modifying and ground work from scratch.






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 15/2/04 at 02:20 PM Reply With Quote
I consider "Locost" more of a philosophy or generic category...kind of succesor to the old "specials" description.....think back to the mag "kit cars and specials".....

Ok, the majority are based on the seven style, but my feeling it is the "doing it yourself" to a great or lesser extent rather than the overall seven look is the key factor.....

So, if anything, a locost is absolutely a non-make....in my eyes at least....

[Edited on 15/2/04 by Alan B]

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
stephen_gusterson

posted on 15/2/04 at 06:18 PM Reply With Quote
I prefer 'special' as a term than locost.

locost sounds kinda cheap and crappy - which isnt something you want to apply to summat you put so much of your life into.

atb

steve






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
James

posted on 16/2/04 at 01:00 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by stephen_gusterson
I prefer 'special' as a term than locost.

locost sounds kinda cheap and crappy - which isnt something you want to apply to summat you put so much of your life into.

atb

steve


Gotta agree with you there- I'm a bit uncomfortable calling it a Locost- people make assumptions and they're not generally good!

I generally say something along the lines of:

"replica of a Lotus 7- you know, like a Westfield/Caterham jobbie you see around a lot"

What's interesting is people just don't grasp the idea of what you're doing when 'scratch' building! They insist you're building a kit- till you tell them you've welded your own chassis together that is...

James

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Jasper

posted on 16/2/04 at 01:10 PM Reply With Quote
I don't think it would work, too many variables, and at wot point is it no longer a 'locost' but an MK or Luego?

Maybe if you build your own chassis it can rightly be called a locost? (I did!)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
philgregson

posted on 16/2/04 at 01:52 PM Reply With Quote
Well,

I agree with almost everyone about almost everything (in this context at least).

Calling it a Locost just makes people think that you're building a kit which is exactly what I didn't want to do. It also has to be said that Locost is a bit of a crappy name with crappy conotations.

I agree with Alan that it is more of a philosophy and I would describe a Locost as a scratch built car inspired by RC's book - both in form (i.e. a lightweight, basic sports car) and in the 'do it yourself' ethos.

I don't knock anyone who does it diferently but I want to be able to say that I built it (more or less) from scratch. Buying a part off the shelf just feels like cheating to me (although some times I have nearly sucumbed to the the idea of buying new bits and actually geting on with the build for once).

At the end of the day I don't want it to have a label I want it to be mine, done in my way (or a way pinched from someone on this site).

Just my 2p worth

Cheers

Phil

[Edited on 16/2/04 by philgregson]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.