jolson
|
posted on 30/3/05 at 08:09 PM |
|
|
Ultimate Pose Value?
Spotted this at work today....
carbon fibre bolts!
http://www.poshbikes.com/product.php?id=255
Cheers
John
|
|
|
smart51
|
posted on 30/3/05 at 08:19 PM |
|
|
£36 for four
carbon reinforced PEEK. never heard of that before. Have to say - not as worried as when I thought it was carbon reinforced epoxy. still, I bet you
round the heads off them very easily.
|
|
Hellfire
|
posted on 30/3/05 at 08:20 PM |
|
|
M5 - £36 for 4
M6 - £44 for 4
Bejeesus.... would ya look at that....
|
|
mookaloid
|
posted on 30/3/05 at 08:22 PM |
|
|
I wouldn't use them to actually hold anything together
|
|
jolson
|
posted on 30/3/05 at 08:46 PM |
|
|
says on the website that
"In fact these bolts have a proven higher yeld strength than steel! Although they are lighter than aluminium."
a little further down the page they suggest limiting their use to the most lightly loaded bit of a bike
|
|
kingr
|
posted on 30/3/05 at 10:16 PM |
|
|
Yes, I noticed that - let me think of all the aluminium bolts I have on my car...... errr, none! I suppose they'd look pretty nice holding my CF
dashboard on, but it would be a bloody expensive way of doing it.
Kingr
|
|
DarrenW
|
posted on 31/3/05 at 09:48 AM |
|
|
It would be better / cheaper to increase bhp than use cf bolts.
Nice idea but no cigar!!!
|
|
Wadders
|
posted on 31/3/05 at 04:25 PM |
|
|
Or just eat less?
Originally posted by DarrenW
It would be better / cheaper to increase bhp than use cf bolts.
Nice idea but no cigar!!!
|
|
Peteff
|
posted on 31/3/05 at 05:39 PM |
|
|
They're only for use on bicycles anyway by the look of that site. I'd still be a bit wary of them in any critical areas. My top speed
downhill with a tailwind is 48mph, I wouldn't like to think I was trusting them to hold the brakes or handlebars on.
yours, Pete
I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.
|
|