Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: modfied classics
02GF74

posted on 25/4/06 at 03:57 PM Reply With Quote
modfied classics

anyone know the scoop or have more info. abpiut the government bringing into law the preventiojn of modifying classi cars?

For you to know what I am on about, was an article in Classic Ford with a petition - I will get the article - and it was something like neededg SVA if the original engine e.g. Cosworth into an Anglia or suspension mods being fitted requiring an SVA.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
DIY Si

posted on 25/4/06 at 04:20 PM Reply With Quote
I heard this too, but haven't been able to find out what's going on with it. If it does come in, I'm up the usual with out a propelling device. There's barely a standard part on my '71 mini. Which does make it really fast. Until the men in gray pass a silly rule like this one.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Lawnmower

posted on 25/4/06 at 04:28 PM Reply With Quote
Will affect all hotrods, and most landy too.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
donut

posted on 25/4/06 at 04:34 PM Reply With Quote
I think you can mod the car but you will need to put it through SVA. This will be a pain for 99% of people who mod their cars but ok for peeps who build Hot Rods from scratch ( so to speek) as they need SVA like us.

Of course i may be wrong.





Andy

When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/andywest1/

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
owelly

posted on 25/4/06 at 05:09 PM Reply With Quote
There has been much discussion about these changes in PPC mag and I'm sure the official word from DVLA and the grey suit is........
They have no plans to implement any further changes.
I could be wrong as I don't pay too much attention to things that mention such things!!!
I'll have a check...





http://www.ppcmag.co.uk

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
DIY Si

posted on 25/4/06 at 05:28 PM Reply With Quote
If they do, I'm still up the usual.... My car would never pass an sva on emissions alone. Could probably sort it otherwise, but would have to change the engine to pass.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
theconrodkid

posted on 25/4/06 at 05:44 PM Reply With Quote
i belive this is the case in germany,you have to have an inspection for every item you fit that isnt standard,and all parts have to be aproved and added to the reg doccument,ive seen a reg doc that looked like a bog roll





who cares who wins
pass the pork pies

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Simon

posted on 25/4/06 at 07:19 PM Reply With Quote
My retest examiner mentioned this - and thought it was daft. Most of us agree.

A chap from DVLA or VOSA replied to Retro Cars editorial and set record straight - IT'S NOT GONNA HAPPEN.

My view - having gone to all the trouble of getting car SVA'd (which I think is a superb method of getting kits etc on the road, unlike previous method), do you think it reasonable for chav boy to stick an unradiused 1mm thick BTCC type spoiler on his car, that could be used for shredding paper, let alone people.

Thought not.

ATB

Simon

[Edited on 25/4/06 by Simon]






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Lawnmower

posted on 25/4/06 at 08:54 PM Reply With Quote
take any classic car,
perhaps you change the engne, add disc brakes whatever, get it va cos of this, it then fails sva on lack of seat belts, not emarked lights, any other design differnces etc.

It has been said a brand new defender will fail an sva.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
jon_boy

posted on 25/4/06 at 09:03 PM Reply With Quote
So if i have modified '72 scimitar would i have needed an SVA?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Simon

posted on 25/4/06 at 09:16 PM Reply With Quote
Is it PPC who have a chap sticking a Meteor engine in an SD1.

Think his design weight might fail!

I think it would need quite a bit of consideration if gov were to think of introducing it.

ATB

Simon






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
cossey
Contributor






Posts 430
Registered 5/12/05
Location Kent
Member Is Offline

Photo Archive Go!
Building: a pile of bits that will someday be a fisher fury

posted on 25/4/06 at 10:10 PM Reply With Quote
it could work if it only covered the new bits eg changing the engine etc but leaving the body as standard you wouldnt have to meet the exterior radius but even that is more trouble than its worth.

getting them checked by an engineer to say that they have been done in a safe manor might be a good idea to stop some idiot from putting a cossie engine in an unstrengthed mk1 escort or similar

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
02GF74

posted on 26/4/06 at 07:44 AM Reply With Quote
I don't know the full story but someone on an LR forum has put together an LR as well as replaced a v8 with a diesel engine and was told needed SVA at the MOT (there are other changes - don't have details)
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
iank

posted on 26/4/06 at 09:33 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by 02GF74
I don't know the full story but someone on an LR forum has put together an LR as well as replaced a v8 with a diesel engine and was told needed SVA at the MOT (there are other changes - don't have details)


He would need an SVA if he's changed the chassis 'significantly' for example stuck a chopped Range Rover chassis under a Landy. This has always been the case since they introduced the new rules, but often ignored by the LR hybrid guys, and not enforced by MOT testers coz most of them don't know or care what an OEM chassis should look like.

But it wouldn't be anything to do with the engine. Even if their were to be new rules about SVA'ing modded classics they aren't in place yet!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
BKLOCO

posted on 26/4/06 at 04:12 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Simon


My view - having gone to all the trouble of getting car SVA'd (which I think is a superb method of getting kits etc on the road, unlike previous method), do you think it reasonable for chav boy to stick an unradiused 1mm thick BTCC type spoiler on his car, that could be used for shredding paper, let alone people.

Thought not.

ATB

Simon




I've got to agree here.
I had to take my youngest lad to the tec on Mon night and in the car park was a chav mobile like you wouldn't believe.
The nearest comparrison I could find to describe the wheel trims was Boadicea's charriot. THEY WERE ALL BUT BLOODY KNIVES.
Its time to regulate some of these twats.
It's just unfortunate that some innocent people may get caught up in it.





Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want!!!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 26/4/06 at 05:03 PM Reply With Quote
I've seen Land Rovers, Minis and kits where the only thing left of the original is the registration. Who is going to police a regulation like this? Will it be left to the MOT station to decide whether you have changed enough of the original to warrant a new test and if you do will it then need a new identity and be brought into the tax fold again as a lot of the altered vehicles seem to be tax exempt.





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Syd Bridge

posted on 28/4/06 at 11:36 AM Reply With Quote
Hi All,
These changes in rules have been in discussion with the govt for years. In that now infamous thread regarding Broken Wishbones, I mentioned that an Aus type system IS going to come in. Be it in dribs and drabs.

The time will come when ANY modification, no matter how minor, will have to be 'Approved' by a recognised signatory; and your builds will HAVE to be supervised by a registered engineer. With the online MOT thing, the responsibility will be on the testing station to make sure your car is the same spec as the sheet that comes up on screen, down to the last little nut and bolt.

The industry only has itself to blame.

Syd.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
James

posted on 1/5/06 at 01:21 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BKLOCO
quote:
Originally posted by Simon


My view - having gone to all the trouble of getting car SVA'd (which I think is a superb method of getting kits etc on the road, unlike previous method), do you think it reasonable for chav boy to stick an unradiused 1mm thick BTCC type spoiler on his car, that could be used for shredding paper, let alone people.

Thought not.

ATB

Simon




I've got to agree here.
I had to take my youngest lad to the tec on Mon night and in the car park was a chav mobile like you wouldn't believe.
The nearest comparrison I could find to describe the wheel trims was Boadicea's charriot. THEY WERE ALL BUT BLOODY KNIVES.
Its time to regulate some of these twats.
It's just unfortunate that some innocent people may get caught up in it.


Is stuff like that not already regulated though? You're not allowed sharp projections on the car I thought. (and I don't mean at SVA but by the Police).
Remember that Rolls that Uri Gellar had with all the bent spoons and stuff stuck on the bodywork? Maybe wrong but I seem to remember he wasn't allowed that on the road.

Cheers,
James





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The fight is won or lost far away from witnesses, behind the lines, in the gym and out there on the road, long before I dance under those lights." - Muhammad Ali

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.