maartenromijn
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 09:14 AM |
|
|
Robin Hood vs. Westfield
Hi all,
With regard to the registration questions (for Netherlands) that I still have, one of the options I have is to buy a registered car.
I have done some searching to find the pro's and cons for Robin Hood compared to Westfield. I have found that the RH is heavy. But does it
provide quality or stiffness in return? Wat about the quality of a Westy? Or is it all depending on the setup?
BLOG: http://thunderroad-super7.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
|
mr henderson
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 09:20 AM |
|
|
Why restrict yourself to those two makes.
If I was looking at buying a second hand car I wouldn't consider either of those unless I saw an exceptional one.
I would be looking at MNR, MK and MAC, maybe Tiger (although I don't like that bonnet bulge) and Luego
John
|
|
|
Mr Whippy
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 09:21 AM |
|
|
The westy will probably easily out handle the r/h but prefer the stainless panels and the bent tube chassis of the r/h as it should be very durable
and safer so that’s the one I’d go for, also costs less
Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet
|
|
|
MikeRJ
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 09:24 AM |
|
|
I very much doubt the RH 2B is either safer or stiffer than a Westfield, it's has an appalling chassis design.
|
|
|
Mr Whippy
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 09:26 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by MikeRJ
I very much doubt the RH 2B is either safer or stiffer than a Westfield, it's has an appalling chassis design.
in what way?
Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet
|
|
|
Dangle_kt
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 09:28 AM |
|
|
I'd tread carefully with RH, and do some reserch.
There a few different models, some are meant to be aweful, I think the more modern ones are better - but not sure which one...
Westfield is a well known brand, and they produce decent cars.
But those two marques are at the two extremes of the market, as has been mentioned why dont you look to the MNR,MK etc.
I think I'd be looking at them, but it is a buyers market at the moment, so dont rush into it, take your time, and pick one that is as closely
speced to what you want as you can.
[Edited on 11/12/08 by Dangle_kt]
|
|
|
tendoshingan
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 10:35 AM |
|
|
I had similar thoughts when I was about to purchase.
I ended up getting a Robin Hood Zero as I thought that it looked much better than the original 2B and seemed to follow the original design much
better.
I also know that it stands up pretty well getting hit in the side by a car on a roundabout.
Seeing as that was what happened when my mate was having a test run at the Robin Hood workshop!!
My only gripe is that there is no build manual (so no shock from RH there) and you still need to fettle a bit. But Richard at RH is always helpful
when I've whinged down the phone.
|
|
|
motorcycle_mayhem
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 11:06 AM |
|
|
If it were me, I'd look at a R1ot.... in fact, I am. Let's call it a GSXRot.
As a Westfield owner I can say that the car is OK, though a tad outdated and certainly not the best in the value for money stakes. For durability, the
Tiger has a great chassis, very strong. MK damn good on the VFM stakes.
|
|
|
maartenromijn
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 11:35 AM |
|
|
Problem is that I have started to build a locost for the reason that LO is in the word. Since I have other financial obligations, children, expensive
house, wife  I do not have that much budget.
Moreover, I think my other half will not agree if I will invest a couple k €€€€ in a 'toy' / hobby. Building the locost is perfect: the
investment are spread over a couple of years.
AND I want to used my saved up money to build a decent garage, 100 sq. metre, isolated, etc.
That's why I am looking into the mentioned cars. I think MNR, Tiger, etc. are too expensive...
BLOG: http://thunderroad-super7.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
mr henderson
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 11:50 AM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by maartenromijn
That's why I am looking into the mentioned cars. I think MNR, Tiger, etc. are too expensive...
I can see why you might think that, but I don't see why you would think Westfield would be a less expensive option
John
|
|
|
maartenromijn
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 12:17 PM |
|
|
Westies are more common in the Netherlands, hence cheaper available.
If there are other brands available (registered) then it is usual a more exotic setup.
I might look into importing myself as well. Should I look on eBay, or are there other possiblities?
Note I am only considering, not actually looking to buy a registered car.
BLOG: http://thunderroad-super7.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
mr henderson
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 12:34 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by maartenromijn
Westies are more common in the Netherlands, hence cheaper available.
That would seem to be an excellent reason. In the UK they are generally considered to be more expensive than many, due to the firm being large and
well established. Having said that, some of their older cars can be bought at good prices.
quote:
Originally posted by maartenromijn
I might look into importing myself as well. Should I look on eBay, or are there other possiblities?
Ebay would probably be the main source, this forum and the westfield one sometimes produce bargains too
John
|
|
|
Dingz
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 01:42 PM |
|
|
As someone has already said there are lots of different types of Robin Hoods, although the 2B is quite heavy it is also roomy, so if you want to carry
a bit of luggage or a tent it is ideal. The stainless steel is a plus too. The westfield will beat it on a track but it depends what you want to use
it for. Could you get over to a show over here? that way you will see lots of different makes and talk with the owners
|
|
|
MikeRJ
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 05:36 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Mr Whippy
quote:
Originally posted by MikeRJ
I very much doubt the RH 2B is either safer or stiffer than a Westfield, it's has an appalling chassis design.
in what way?
I don't think Tricky Dicky ever fully grasped the concept of triangulation.
The sides of the chassis have a couple of nearly-triangles connected by a couple of definately-not-triangles. The sides passenger compartment that
could have provided some side protection are probably weaker than the ones on a locost/westy since they do not directly attach to a stiff bulkhead
structure.
2B Chassis Pic
Bits of bent exhaust pipe were never going to provide a great chassis design, but very importantly for RH it provided a very cheap one.
[Edited on 11/12/08 by MikeRJ]
|
|
|
maartenromijn
|
| posted on 11/12/08 at 06:29 PM |
|
|
Lookin at the pic, this chassis does need some serious triangulation!
BLOG: http://thunderroad-super7.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
