how close can i expect to get the diagonal ratios on a 7 type car with just the balast for the driver ?
I got down to this:
-L-----R-
370 332
396 362
But I have trouble with the right front brake locking up. Could be unrelated...
G
[Edited on 16/7/07 by SkinnyG]
closer than mine... and opposite way round,,, but just realised you are prolly sitting on the wrong side
my front suspension isnt realy adjustable enough, so doubt i will get clower that i am at the moment, as only have the rears to play with
As a percentage term, I managed to get mine spot on weight distribution with me in it. 50% diagonal to diagonal.
Steve
Well ! skinney yours is running, still building mine. How's that thing go? i need a little encouragement.
It freakin' hauls!
I'm ready for more power though. But it's got enough to scare me and the people around me.
Do you frequent the locostusa.com or the Locost_North_America yahoo group?
Git 'er dun!
G
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKwo2BYc15M
quote:
Originally posted by SkinnyG
I got down to this:
-L-----R-
370 332
396 362
But I have trouble with the right front brake locking up. Could be unrelated...
G
[Edited on 16/7/07 by SkinnyG]
LF(370) + RR(362) = 732 lbs
RF(332) + LR(396) = 728 lbs
Diagonals are pretty darn close.
These are static weights WITH driver (LHD).
One philosophy is to get the diagonals at 50/50.
Another philosophy is to get left and right sides at 50/50.
I can't do side-to-side equal weights without some very weird ride heights, so it's diagonals for me.
G