
i am completely for electric cars, fuel cell cars etc, even though the technology is still expensive i think its the way forward, and more people
should buy them. howevers, the people that own companies that cell these fuel cell/electric cars seem to have not a jot of marketing sense or artistic
zeal! look at these picture for an example of the heaps of poo they are trying to peddle! if they want electric/fuel cell etc. to appeal to the
masses, theyve got to get them better looking than this!!
im actually really annoyed they arent making them prettier!!
I totally agree. I've thought this for a long time.
Thankfully, there are always exceptions to a rule:
http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=90123
There is a chap who is producing an electric version of the Haynes roadster for sprints and hillclimbs. Not long duration but bloody quick. i think
the motor produces arround 500 flb of torque!!!
[Edited on 2/6/08 by donut]
I guess the designers are experts in electronics but not car aesthetics. Who knows why they do it? Sure, metal bodied hatchbacks are just too heavy, we know that here on locostbuilders, but building a lightweight aerodynamic car to hold your electric motors doesn't mean your car has to be ugly.
I was thinking this the other day. Electric cars are either a) tiny and ugly - a la G-Whiz, or a reasonably sized car, made of metal, and (heavily)
filled with batteries and other gizmos (a la Toyota prius).
I also don't like the smug look people have driving them, especially the prius. Very few greens seem to realise that the damage you do to the
environment in building a brand new car is way more than you can generate by driving a car, unless it does about 3 million miles (I'll have to
try and figure that out accurately one day...)
What we need is a four door car, say about the size of a mondeo, at no more than half of the weight of a current mondeo. It needs to have a really low
drag coefficient, and a very efficient petrol or diesel engine. If it has to lug around less weight, and less drag, you could probably push a mondy
around decently with a 1.4 engine.....
Add in some extra batteries, kinetic energy recovery (regenerative braking) and small electric motors for queues, and you'd sell millions.
Oh yeh, and it needs to look nice. 
quote:
Originally posted by vinny1275
.... If it has to lug around less weight, and less drag, you could probably push a mondy around decently with a 1.4 engine.....
...
1.25cc - that's a small engine!

quote:
Originally posted by David Jenkins
1.25cc - that's a small engine!
![]()
Link
Nuff said! 



Tesla Roadster gets my vote as well. Good range, fast, very good looking but damned expensive and on the wrong side of the pond!
quote:
Originally posted by vinny1275
I was thinking this the other day. Electric cars are either a) tiny and ugly - a la G-Whiz, or a reasonably sized car, made of metal, and (heavily) filled with batteries and other gizmos (a la Toyota prius).
I also don't like the smug look people have driving them, especially the prius. Very few greens seem to realise that the damage you do to the environment in building a brand new car is way more than you can generate by driving a car, unless it does about 3 million miles (I'll have to try and figure that out accurately one day...)
What we need is a four door car, say about the size of a mondeo, at no more than half of the weight of a current mondeo. It needs to have a really low drag coefficient, and a very efficient petrol or diesel engine. If it has to lug around less weight, and less drag, you could probably push a mondy around decently with a 1.4 engine.....
Add in some extra batteries, kinetic energy recovery (regenerative braking) and small electric motors for queues, and you'd sell millions.
Oh yeh, and it needs to look nice.![]()
cheap and good looking (IMHO) to boot!
quote:
Originally posted by vinny1275
I also don't like the smug look people have driving them, especially the prius. Very few greens seem to realise that the damage you do to the environment in building a brand new car is way more than you can generate by driving a car, unless it does about 3 million miles (I'll have to try and figure that out accurately one day...)
quote:
Originally posted by iank
I've read there was a proof of concept lightweight prototype Mondeo running a 1.25 litre Zetec SE.
No idea if it actually did more than rice pudding skin removal duties.
[Edited on 2/6/08 by iank]
quote:
Originally posted by smart51
quote:
Originally posted by iank
I've read there was a proof of concept lightweight prototype Mondeo running a 1.25 litre Zetec SE.
No idea if it actually did more than rice pudding skin removal duties.
[Edited on 2/6/08 by iank]
No reason why it wouldn't work. Its all to do with power / weight ratio. Make your mondeo as light as the fiesta that donated the engine and you get the same acceleration of the mark. The mondeo is wider than the fiesta so will probably have more drag, but then ford have been making aerodynamic concept cars for decades and could make a mondeo sized car unbelievably good if they wanted. They've proven that they can, and put similar looking cars into production. You can only assume that they don't want to.
quote:
Originally posted by mcerd1
weight is the biggest problem, the new fiesta (not out yet) is supposed to be one of the first new fords where they are basically talking about 'adding lightness' to help with fuel economy/CO2
quote:
Originally posted by MikeRJ
Unfortunately making very light cars makes things difficult you want lots of Euro NCAP stars...