Board logo

Thinking of getting a van
mr henderson - 2/7/08 at 05:44 PM

As some of you already know, I've started a kit car workshop and I find myself needing some suitable transport.

I'm thinking of gettting a minbus rather than a van, they seem to have been looked after better, and they look smarter anyway. Naturally I will take most of the seats out so I can get the interesting stuff likes chassis and engines and other bits in.

I'm familiar with Transits and LDV's (which I understand use Transit engines etc) but obviously there are other makes of which I know little.

I'm not looking to spend very much at this stage, but I don't care about how old it is (as long as it doesn't look too rough) or its fuel consumption as I can walk to work and will only drive it when I really need to

Any thoughts would be appreciated

John


theconrodkid - 2/7/08 at 05:48 PM

TRANSIT! best van ever made.end of story


donut - 2/7/08 at 05:54 PM

^^^What he said!^^^


Volvorsport - 2/7/08 at 06:29 PM

sprinter .

or a transit .


Myke 2463 - 2/7/08 at 06:48 PM

Hi John, Transit. LWB Hightop cant be beaten, very hard to kill, Good luck with the business, Mike.


Danozeman - 2/7/08 at 06:56 PM

If you dont want to spend alot i would look at ldv convoys. Good vans really and transit engines. I work on them all day and they stand up to postman abuse so cant be that bad. Cheap parts too.

Transits if youv got a bit more money.

Then lots more merc sprinter or VW.


mcerd1 - 2/7/08 at 07:11 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Danozeman
If you dont want to spend alot i would look at ldv convoys. Good vans really and transit engines. I work on them all day and they stand up to postman abuse so cant be that bad. Cheap parts too.

Transits if youv got a bit more money.


LDVs' are definatly the value choice

but I'd rather have a Transit

just don't get too old an LDV, the older ones (mid 90's) have really bad Pug engines instead of transit ones


PAUL FISHER - 2/7/08 at 07:41 PM

Renault master,great for fuel economy,Ive ran ldv's and transits,and now renault master,cheaper to buy new than the transit,I get a average of 35mpg out of my 120dci minibus,I got 26mpg out of a 90bhp transit minibus,100% reliable,costs no more to maintain,140,000 miles in the last 3 years,and thats a lot of money saved in fuel alone,for this reason I would not be able to afford to run a transit anymore,I will be buying another one next time


Triton - 2/7/08 at 07:57 PM

T4 veedub but you will pay more for it than most others but then again they hold their value so swings n round things

Mark


darrens - 2/7/08 at 10:05 PM

transit "WORST VAN EVER MADE", it has a ford diesel in it for christs sake. And if your going old enough to get one with a pinto in it, way under powered due to weight.

VW make good ens, don't look as pretty as some on the road, but good vans


eccsmk - 2/7/08 at 10:09 PM

im keeping an eye on this thread as im after a new van
ive been warned away from vivaro's and even the older transits (2003) shape as a friend of mine runs a fleet ie 50 or more and almost all of the with the 2.2 diesel engined ones have had gearbox (inc drive shafts) or engine trouble
saying that he knows only too well that they get abused really badly
hop your search goes well


[Edited on 2/7/08 by eccsmk]


hillbillyracer - 2/7/08 at 10:32 PM

If you know your LDVs & can put up with it being a bit stoneage then I dont think they can be beaten for value. Rust isnt too bad, we have an M reg at work & although tatty it's got no structural rot, never needed welding for the MOT. It's got a non-turbo Peugeot engine though, not fast!
Has nobody realised the rot problem Transits have? To be fair if you get a sound one & dont mind it being a bit crude they are a tough old thing & cheap to keep on the road but the rust is a real killer on them.
The newer ones from W reg on drive much better but as said there's been some engine bother on them & the rust isnt beaten on them yet either.
The Renult Master is better in many respects, drives much better & less prone to rot but if you're looking at an older van the double wishbone front suspension with inboard springs can be a bugger to work on. Seized bolts & captive nuts that break off inside the chassis legs, top fun!
If you're looking at something a bit smaller the VW T4 transporter is a great van but mabye not worth the price premium the have due to the VW scene.
I've got a Fiat Scudo (same as a Citroen Dispatch & Peugeot Expert) & it's been fine apart from the synchros going in the box, does 35+mpg, no rot at R reg, carries 800kg & tows 1300.


mcerd1 - 3/7/08 at 07:43 AM

quote:
Originally posted by hillbillyracer
If you know your LDVs & can put up with it being a bit stoneage then I dont think they can be beaten for value. Rust isnt too bad, we have an M reg at work & although tatty it's got no structural rot, never needed welding for the MOT. It's got a non-turbo Peugeot engine though, not fast!


I used to drive one of these now and then (same age, same engine) and that sounds about right

but when the engine died they got a transit instead
(don't these pug 2.1 or 2.3 engines have a major issue with overheating, followed by softening of the block or something )
transit engined LDV's are much better, the turbo ones are quite quick