
Max off to court again - he's on the attack this time though!!
Interesting one Mr Mosley - but i dont think you have much chance with this one (unless the case is heard in Italy)!!
Strange that when he says
"So I think they invented that because of my antecedents and that was a really a disgusting thing to do and they shouldn't have done
it."
he's not using "really a disgusting thing to do and they shouldn't have done it" to describe the behaviour of
a) his family
b) himself
but in fact a newspaper. Personally I think his behaviour was damn dodgey and bordering on really quite offensive (having seen the photos, the videos
etc etc) and I can't help but feel that all this bluff and bluster is just a bizarre smokescreen to cover up for his complete lack of tact and
integrity.
Damn! There goes my F1 ride for 2010 
I particularly liked the line near the end.."One was that I was very, very careful about what I did and who with." But the Mistress he
organised it with was the one who actually gave (ok sold) the tapes to the NOTW wasn't she??? At least she could clearly be bought off to not
appear at court hey Max - not that i'd ever think him capable of paying that woman off at all!! 

[Edited on 7/10/08 by Paul TigerB6]
Well I suppose that's one way for the sado masochistic son of a facist who happens to be a failed politician to keep himself in the limelight.
Most people would know that the damage to their credibility is already done and keep their heads down for a while - I mean it's not as if there
isn't any proof is there!
Steve
quote:
Earlier this year, the High Court ruled that the News of the World breached Mr Mosley's privacy and awarded him £60,000 in damages.
quote:
He told the BBC that he wanted to close a legal loophole which allows editors to publish revelations without first contacting the individual concerned.
quote:
Originally posted by Rod Ends
quote:
Earlier this year, the High Court ruled that the News of the World breached Mr Mosley's privacy and awarded him £60,000 in damages.
quote:
He told the BBC that he wanted to close a legal loophole which allows editors to publish revelations without first contacting the individual concerned.
For those that missed it on the tv news
Whats that on the shelf?? Well its deffo not a McLaren! 
if Max is to hold a position of such power and influence then he should accept that any negative behaviour will reach the public
Its part of the job for him, when he takes a role of head of a major organisation (and a very well paid on at that), then he forsakes his right to
privacy if it is of genuine interest to the public
He should just resign and draw a line under all of this
quote:
Originally posted by novacaine
Its part of the job for him, when he takes a role of head of a major organisation (and a very well paid on at that), then he forsakes his right to privacy if it is of genuine interest to the public