Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Kg / Hp
DarrenW

posted on 21/8/07 at 10:06 AM Reply With Quote
Kg / Hp

Just been reading the BMW mag about the new M3. Its getting a V8 420HP motor. The lightweight version was quoted as 3.8Kg / Hp - not seen it wrote like that before.

By my calcs this makes it 1596Kg, 420HP, 3.8Kg / Hp or 263Hp / Ton, 0-60 in 4.8secs. Should be an entertaining drive!!

My old M3 Evo was 1480Kg, 321bhp, 4.6Kg / Hp or 217Hp/Ton, 0-60 in 5.5secs.

im chasing 140Hp, my car is approx 580Kg = 4.1Kg/Hp or 241Hp/Ton so that compares well to a known good car. Might take some mods of the transmission to make the acceleration times compare though.



How do these figures compare to others with Pinto power (or other set ups for that matter?)






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
scoobyis2cool

posted on 21/8/07 at 10:49 AM Reply With Quote
Hi Darren, I think kg/hp is the American way of writing it. It doesn't seem as intuitive to me but I guess it just depends what you're used to.

Either way, your estimate of around 5-5.5 seconds sounds about right to me; I had a standard pinto (105ish bhp), and my car was I think 620kg, and I timed it at about 6 seconds to 60 (with a passenger too), so with an extra 35-40bhp I should think you'll easily knock half a second or so off that. Plus it feels a lot faster with the wind in your hair!

Pete

[Edited on 21/8/07 by scoobyis2cool]





It's not that I'm lazy, it's that I just don't care...

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
martyn_16v

posted on 21/8/07 at 02:42 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by scoobyis2cool
I think kg/hp is the American way of writing it.


Americans and metric? I doubt it...






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
scoobyis2cool

posted on 21/8/07 at 02:45 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by martyn_16v
Americans and metric? I doubt it...

Hmm, good point. In that case I'm not sure, European maybe? Either way I prefer bhp/ton, it just seems more natural to me because bigger is better!

Pete





It's not that I'm lazy, it's that I just don't care...

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
bimbleuk

posted on 21/8/07 at 03:14 PM Reply With Quote
2.01 kg/hp or 499 bhp/ton not including driver weight though.

So on paper some very impressive figures though only briefly reached at peak RPM.

You could quite easily assume my car is stunningly quick off the line. Though in reality with an open diff and a 150BHP rated clutch I have to be careful with quick launches. The in gear acceleration is however rather bloody good

Have a read of this article on autospeed.com which compares a couple of methods

http://autospeed.drive.com.au/cms/A_108704/article.html

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Daimo_45

posted on 21/8/07 at 07:02 PM Reply With Quote
I SAW IT YESTERDAY??????!!!!!!!! Not even released!!! Must have been the press car and it was red so figures. 90% persuaded my dad to get one, fingers x as I will be on policy!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Simon

posted on 21/8/07 at 07:35 PM Reply With Quote
I sink it'z juuust ze Gerrrman vay ov do ing sings

ATB

Simon






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.