Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Any military tacticians here?
C10CoryM

posted on 27/1/08 at 03:08 AM Reply With Quote
Any military tacticians here?

Hey guys,
Is there a specific term, or best known case for when the occupying army "concedes" to the weaker guerrilla army? Idea being the hidden leaders will show themselves in public so you can gather information for a later suprise attack. Thinking along the lines of the last two Isreal/Palestine conflicts. Also remember a Roman emporer (Diocletian?) saying the rebels won, then slaughtering them in an arena.
Anyhow, just curious if there is a specific term for that.
Cheers.





"Our watchword evermore shall be: The Maple Leaf Forever!"

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Macbeast

posted on 27/1/08 at 06:19 AM Reply With Quote
Tactical retreat ?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ivan

posted on 27/1/08 at 07:02 AM Reply With Quote
Deceit






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
foskid

posted on 27/1/08 at 08:34 AM Reply With Quote
politics?
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
blakep82

posted on 27/1/08 at 11:20 AM Reply With Quote
what are you planning?!





________________________

IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083

don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
iank

posted on 27/1/08 at 11:28 AM Reply With Quote
Some food for thought under these
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betrayal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_deception
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambush
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfidy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feint

I'd have said Feint Retreat is the closest in spirit to what you are describing, but it's more a military strategy than the more political one you describe.





--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
StevieB

posted on 27/1/08 at 11:58 AM Reply With Quote
In terms of real ops, it would fall under the banner of a deception manouvre (smoke and mirrors), followed by a disrupt and destroy phase (ambush).

It's actually far more difficult to pull of than you'd expect - really easy to recognise a poor deception plan if you know what you'r looking for

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Confused but excited.

posted on 27/1/08 at 04:47 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by C10CoryM
Hey guys,
Is there a specific term, or best known case for when the occupying army "concedes" to the weaker guerrilla army?


The Americans got the first half of this tactic right, they called it Vietnam.





Tell them about the bent treacle edges!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
C10CoryM

posted on 29/1/08 at 03:49 AM Reply With Quote
Thanks guys.
I couldn't think of a term for it either

Cheers.





"Our watchword evermore shall be: The Maple Leaf Forever!"

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.