Tim 45
|
| posted on 25/4/08 at 10:10 PM |
|
|
Unbelievable
I take it their collective brain cell was on holiday
linky
|
|
|
|
|
Paradoxia0
|
| posted on 25/4/08 at 10:21 PM |
|
|
quality idiots there!
As you say, unbelievable!
There is no replacement for displacement...
|
|
|
eznfrank
|
| posted on 26/4/08 at 06:00 AM |
|
|
And I bet the outcome will be a year long battle to get them to admit liability for the damage, and he'll still have to pay the fine!!!!
|
|
|
macspeedy
|
| posted on 26/4/08 at 07:08 AM |
|
|
Now that is messed up !
|
|
|
nitram38
|
| posted on 26/4/08 at 08:22 AM |
|
|
What really fries my noodle is that I know this stretch of road which is a main route off the A3.
The tail back caused by closing one lane of the one way system while they tried to remove a car that was not in anyones way is beyond me. Why
wasn't a £60 fine enough?
The nanny state has enabled minimum wage hitlers to get away with this sort thing everyday.
Come the revolution.....................
|
|
|
jollygreengiant
|
| posted on 26/4/08 at 08:55 AM |
|
|
Surely as a point of liability, the flat bed driver should have received the 'Second' parking ticket as 'He' was the person
that parked it there for the second time NOT the owner.?
Beware of the Goldfish in the tulip mines. The ONLY defence against them is smoking peanut butter sandwiches.
|
|
|
