steve m
|
| posted on 9/7/07 at 06:56 PM |
|
|
It is a real shame that these "planners" are not more sympethetic to the folk that have to live with some of the dreadfull buildings that
pop up,
But it is a matter of fact that in any buisness, money changes hands, to allow dodgy dealings, one of which is the planned Fire station, that once
built will be less than 50 metres from my back gate
Yet 10 years ago, the land could not be built on as it was "a designated nature reserve"and had a 50 year exlusion put on It by the
previous owner,
so someone in my local council, will make thousands in a back hander, and sod it, to nature, and all my neighbours ?
[Edited on 9/7/07 by steve m]
|
|
|
|
|
smart51
|
| posted on 9/7/07 at 08:29 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by ned
Well for anyone who remembers this post or even cares, I got my letter through this morning to say that the proposal was rejected.
I'm glad that you're happy. I don't object to garden development, if it's done right, but I do object to annoying the
neighbours. The best garden developments fit into the neighbourhood not clash against them.
|
|
|
|
