Alan B
|
posted on 16/8/02 at 01:34 AM |
|
|
Opinions wanted
Guys,
I'm looking at two possible rear arch styles for my car body (currently making the plug)
They are pictures "arch style 1" and "arch style 2" in Alan B photo archive. One is real the other is a photo-edited option.
If anyone one would like to have a look at them and offer a preference or indeed any other comment I'd appreciate the feedback.
Cheers, Alan
|
|
|
Metal Hippy™
|
posted on 16/8/02 at 02:41 AM |
|
|
Hmmmmm difficult one.
I think I personally would say the first one, but with a slight adjustment to make the top of it slightly more of a sweeping curve than coming to a
point almost...
Having looked at your site for other pics of the body I reckon that'd work quite well.
President of the Non-conformist Locost Builders Club. E-mail for details...
|
|
interestedparty
|
posted on 16/8/02 at 07:23 AM |
|
|
Of the two I think it needs to be arch 1, or something has to be done about the front of arch 2. Have you tried it raising the rear extension of arch
1 where it touches the rear of the car?
John
As some day it may happen that a victim must be found,
I've got a little list-- I've got a little list
Of society offenders who might well be underground,
And who never would be missed-- who never would be missed!
|
|
JohnFol
|
posted on 16/8/02 at 04:17 PM |
|
|
arch 1 looks like it it comprises of 3 distinct sections across the top, with a radius being the middle one (well slightly left of top). Maybe making
it more like 1 continual sweep may improve it, but I prefer it to arch 2
PS. Most impresssive work!
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 16/8/02 at 04:58 PM |
|
|
Guys,
Thanks for the honesty and constructiveness so far.
As you may know or figured out arch 1 is the fake one, and as you say it's peak/apex is a little sharp and mis-centred due to being a quick edit of
arch 2.
If I do change to arch 1, which looks very likely considering the voting is unanimous so far (including me), I will be incorporating the improvements
being suggested.
I appreciate you all taking the time to comment, thanks.
Please keep the comments coming.
|
|
johnston
|
posted on 16/8/02 at 08:49 PM |
|
|
i'd gop for arch 1 arch 2 has a sorta "vintage" look if u no wot i mean
but seen as ur editing is so good and to serve my curiousity wot about extending the diagonal bit at the front of the arch up to the top of the
quarter panel and blendig it in then blending the bac half of the arch to the bac panel and up to the top ..
looks alright in my head but i have the artistic sense of an ameobia
|
|
ChrisW
|
posted on 16/8/02 at 08:59 PM |
|
|
Just another vote for arch 1 Alan!
Chris
My gaff my rules
|
|
locodude
|
posted on 16/8/02 at 10:25 PM |
|
|
Alan
Arch1
Chris PTM
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 17/8/02 at 02:06 AM |
|
|
Once again everyone, thanks!
It makes a change easier when everyone agrees with you!
quote: i'd gop for arch 1 arch 2 has a sorta "vintage" look if u no wot i mean
It's funny you say that, as the only two people to vote for arch 2 were my mum and mum in law
quote: but seen as ur editing is so good and to serve my curiousity wot about extending the diagonal bit at the front of the arch up to the top of the
quarter panel and blendig it in then blending the bac half of the arch to the bac panel and up to the top ..
like arch 31 in my file? It's certainly different, but arch 1 is declared the winner
|
|
johnston
|
posted on 17/8/02 at 08:47 AM |
|
|
well b4 any1 else says it my idea was shite
thanx for tryin ab
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 17/8/02 at 12:37 PM |
|
|
quote: thanx for tryin ab
Hey, no problem
If you don't try new/different stuff you never progress!
|
|
johnston
|
posted on 17/8/02 at 03:18 PM |
|
|
alan was lookin at ur site is that ur shocks sitting horizontal above the main frame and bolted to ur rollbar
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 17/8/02 at 04:44 PM |
|
|
quote: alan was lookin at ur site is that ur shocks sitting horizontal above the main frame and bolted to ur rollbar
Yes that's right. There is a good picture in my archive called rear frame or something!
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 19/8/02 at 01:56 AM |
|
|
For anyone who may be interested. I've posted a pic in my archive called something like "rear arch in progress".
Thanks again for the feedback.
|
|
Metal Hippy™
|
posted on 19/8/02 at 02:09 AM |
|
|
Looking good Mr B
President of the Non-conformist Locost Builders Club. E-mail for details...
|
|
johnston
|
posted on 19/8/02 at 04:26 PM |
|
|
alan wot are you usin so that the bit between the relay arm from the suspension and the shock will pivot
i was told only a rose joint would be up to the job and would be hellishly expensive to make
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 19/8/02 at 05:06 PM |
|
|
quote: alan wot are you usin so that the bit between the relay arm from the suspension and the shock will pivot
i was told only a rose joint would be up to the job and would be hellishly expensive to make
I guess you mean the bellcrank. It's pivoted on a teflon inpregnated steel backed bronze bushing with a maximum load rating of around 12000 kg.
Should be fine by my calculations.
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 19/8/02 at 06:33 PM |
|
|
quote:
I guess you mean the bellcrank. It's pivoted on a teflon inpregnated steel backed bronze bushing with a maximum load rating of around 12000 kg.
Should be fine by my calculations.
Just posted a screen capture of the assembly in my picture archive. It should explain it better.
|
|
johnston
|
posted on 19/8/02 at 10:30 PM |
|
|
and wot is a quote: teflon inpregnated steel backed bronze bushing
when i'm at home with a bacon and egg soda
|
|
Alan B
|
posted on 20/8/02 at 12:28 AM |
|
|
quote: and wot is a quote: teflon inpregnated steel backed bronze bushing
when i'm at home with a bacon and egg soda
Swap?
|
|
johnston
|
posted on 20/8/02 at 11:00 PM |
|
|
go to your local irish bit of your town and see if you can get a baker to make ya soda bread like an irish version o pitta bread well good stuff
slice it and stick a fried egg bacon and sausages in it loadsa red sauce and eat like a sanwich
your turn
|
|