Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Opinions wanted
Alan B

posted on 16/8/02 at 01:34 AM Reply With Quote
Opinions wanted

Guys,

I'm looking at two possible rear arch styles for my car body (currently making the plug)
They are pictures "arch style 1" and "arch style 2" in Alan B photo archive. One is real the other is a photo-edited option.

If anyone one would like to have a look at them and offer a preference or indeed any other comment I'd appreciate the feedback.

Cheers, Alan

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Metal Hippy™

posted on 16/8/02 at 02:41 AM Reply With Quote
Hmmmmm difficult one.

I think I personally would say the first one, but with a slight adjustment to make the top of it slightly more of a sweeping curve than coming to a point almost...

Having looked at your site for other pics of the body I reckon that'd work quite well.





President of the Non-conformist Locost Builders Club. E-mail for details...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
interestedparty

posted on 16/8/02 at 07:23 AM Reply With Quote
Of the two I think it needs to be arch 1, or something has to be done about the front of arch 2. Have you tried it raising the rear extension of arch 1 where it touches the rear of the car?

John





As some day it may happen that a victim must be found,
I've got a little list-- I've got a little list
Of society offenders who might well be underground,
And who never would be missed-- who never would be missed!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
JohnFol

posted on 16/8/02 at 04:17 PM Reply With Quote
arch 1 looks like it it comprises of 3 distinct sections across the top, with a radius being the middle one (well slightly left of top). Maybe making it more like 1 continual sweep may improve it, but I prefer it to arch 2

PS. Most impresssive work!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 16/8/02 at 04:58 PM Reply With Quote
Guys,

Thanks for the honesty and constructiveness so far.

As you may know or figured out arch 1 is the fake one, and as you say it's peak/apex is a little sharp and mis-centred due to being a quick edit of arch 2.

If I do change to arch 1, which looks very likely considering the voting is unanimous so far (including me), I will be incorporating the improvements being suggested.

I appreciate you all taking the time to comment, thanks.

Please keep the comments coming.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
johnston

posted on 16/8/02 at 08:49 PM Reply With Quote
i'd gop for arch 1 arch 2 has a sorta "vintage" look if u no wot i mean

but seen as ur editing is so good and to serve my curiousity wot about extending the diagonal bit at the front of the arch up to the top of the quarter panel and blendig it in then blending the bac half of the arch to the bac panel and up to the top ..


looks alright in my head but i have the artistic sense of an ameobia






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
ChrisW

posted on 16/8/02 at 08:59 PM Reply With Quote
Just another vote for arch 1 Alan!

Chris





My gaff my rules

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
locodude

posted on 16/8/02 at 10:25 PM Reply With Quote
Alan
Arch1
Chris PTM

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 17/8/02 at 02:06 AM Reply With Quote
Once again everyone, thanks!

It makes a change easier when everyone agrees with you!

quote:
i'd gop for arch 1 arch 2 has a sorta "vintage" look if u no wot i mean



It's funny you say that, as the only two people to vote for arch 2 were my mum and mum in law

quote:
but seen as ur editing is so good and to serve my curiousity wot about extending the diagonal bit at the front of the arch up to the top of the quarter panel and blendig it in then blending the bac half of the arch to the bac panel and up to the top ..



like arch 31 in my file? It's certainly different, but arch 1 is declared the winner

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
johnston

posted on 17/8/02 at 08:47 AM Reply With Quote
well b4 any1 else says it my idea was shite

thanx for tryin ab






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 17/8/02 at 12:37 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
thanx for tryin ab


Hey, no problem
If you don't try new/different stuff you never progress!

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
johnston

posted on 17/8/02 at 03:18 PM Reply With Quote
alan was lookin at ur site is that ur shocks sitting horizontal above the main frame and bolted to ur rollbar






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 17/8/02 at 04:44 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
alan was lookin at ur site is that ur shocks sitting horizontal above the main frame and bolted to ur rollbar


Yes that's right. There is a good picture in my archive called rear frame or something!

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 19/8/02 at 01:56 AM Reply With Quote
For anyone who may be interested. I've posted a pic in my archive called something like "rear arch in progress".

Thanks again for the feedback.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Metal Hippy™

posted on 19/8/02 at 02:09 AM Reply With Quote
Looking good Mr B





President of the Non-conformist Locost Builders Club. E-mail for details...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
johnston

posted on 19/8/02 at 04:26 PM Reply With Quote
alan wot are you usin so that the bit between the relay arm from the suspension and the shock will pivot

i was told only a rose joint would be up to the job and would be hellishly expensive to make






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 19/8/02 at 05:06 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
alan wot are you usin so that the bit between the relay arm from the suspension and the shock will pivot

i was told only a rose joint would be up to the job and would be hellishly expensive to make


I guess you mean the bellcrank. It's pivoted on a teflon inpregnated steel backed bronze bushing with a maximum load rating of around 12000 kg. Should be fine by my calculations.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 19/8/02 at 06:33 PM Reply With Quote
quote:

I guess you mean the bellcrank. It's pivoted on a teflon inpregnated steel backed bronze bushing with a maximum load rating of around 12000 kg. Should be fine by my calculations.



Just posted a screen capture of the assembly in my picture archive. It should explain it better.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
johnston

posted on 19/8/02 at 10:30 PM Reply With Quote
and wot is a
quote:
teflon inpregnated steel backed bronze bushing
when i'm at home with a bacon and egg soda






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Alan B

posted on 20/8/02 at 12:28 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
and wot is a
quote:
teflon inpregnated steel backed bronze bushing
when i'm at home with a bacon and egg soda


Swap?

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
johnston

posted on 20/8/02 at 11:00 PM Reply With Quote
go to your local irish bit of your town and see if you can get a baker to make ya soda bread like an irish version o pitta bread well good stuff

slice it and stick a fried egg bacon and sausages in it loadsa red sauce and eat like a sanwich

your turn






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.