macspeedy
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 08:36 PM |
|
|
Have a guess what this is
Someone should beable to work this one out?
what type of 7 this is?
[Edited on 2/6/05 by macspeedy]
 
Rescued attachment image002.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
flak monkey
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 08:41 PM |
|
|
Not sure...but not liking the lack of trans' tunnel!
Its not a Sylva is it??
David 
Sera
http://www.motosera.com
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 08:45 PM |
|
|
looks like a 7 replica to me 
Beware! Bourettes is binfectious.
|
|
|
chriscook
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 08:45 PM |
|
|
No its not a Sylva
|
|
|
jambojeef
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 08:52 PM |
|
|
Looks like Indy IRS but its got the trailing arm mounts.....?
Im confused - it happens very easily...
So go on then - what is it?
|
|
|
pbura
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 08:52 PM |
|
|
Pre-lit Westie with an Indy rear end?
Pete
|
|
|
Cita
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 08:55 PM |
|
|
Rover 75?
|
|
|
Danozeman
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 08:56 PM |
|
|
Im for westy with different rear welded on..
Dan
Built the purple peril!! Let the modifications begin!!
http://www.eastangliankitcars.co.uk
|
|
|
zilspeed
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 08:56 PM |
|
|
Ok - I'll bite.
Original Westfield 7Se - the pre lit job with the round trans tunnel. Originally live axle with ford type 9. Currently undergoing an IRS
conversion.
You can still see the 4 link brackets.
How badly wrong am I ?
[Edited on 2/6/05 by zilspeed]
|
|
|
DorsetStrider
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 09:09 PM |
|
|
I don't know what it is but I'm taking a guess that it's not going to pass it's SVA this week.
Who the f**K tightened this up!
|
|
|
colibriman
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 09:17 PM |
|
|
certainly looks Indy rear....but round sides and tunnel makes me think cateringvan..........
edit : oh...and those bollards and kerbing look like outside MK's place...
[Edited on 2/6/05 by colibriman]
need a bike engine? - www.colibriman.com
SVA ready Mk Indyblade possibly for sale.....if the offers good...!
|
NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
|
mangogrooveworkshop
|
| posted on 2/6/05 at 09:18 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by chris mason
looks to me like an early dax rush with a new mk irs rear end 
Chris
Smart lad Its a MAX part Mk and Part DAX!!
Its one of the demo cars used at kitcar shows with Castrol livery
Its rear axle blew up so it got a grafted rear put on.
[Edited on 2-6-05 by mangogrooveworkshop]
|
|
|
Hellfire
|
| posted on 3/6/05 at 12:24 AM |
|
|
All I was going to say was:
"It's the one outside MK Sportscars at the moment"
|
|
|
Kissy
|
| posted on 3/6/05 at 06:17 AM |
|
|
Early Dax?
|
|
|
carnut
|
| posted on 3/6/05 at 06:53 AM |
|
|
Its definately a caterham with an indy rear end. Looking at it, I would also say the Caterham was a live axle one originally.
|
|
|
Jeffers_S13
|
| posted on 3/6/05 at 09:29 AM |
|
|
It looks very much like a, now modified to IRS, originally live axle Rush, I should know  note the lack of propshaft cage/framework and the side
panels are rolled over into the cockpit area, that also looks like a DAX can, BUT having said all this the rollover hoop isnt integral to the chassis
(mine is) and the other thing that looks a bit different is the location of the fuel tank filler, they are normally on the passenger side. So now Im
not sure...
|
|
|
carnut
|
| posted on 3/6/05 at 02:42 PM |
|
|
I presumed that everything back from just forward of the seat panel was new including the stays that go up to the rear panel frame. If these stays
are not new then I am wrong about it being a caterham because on a caterham these are curvedtube and the pic shows straight pieces.
|
|
|
DarrenW
|
| posted on 3/6/05 at 02:52 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by carnut
I presumed that everything back from just forward of the seat panel was new including the stays that go up to the rear panel frame. If these stays
are not new then I am wrong about it being a caterham because on a caterham these are curvedtube and the pic shows straight pieces.
You can stop guessing now. See posts above - its identity was revealed this morning.
|
|
|
Alan B
|
| posted on 3/6/05 at 02:54 PM |
|
|
Even I knew it was something to do with MK....
I recognised the background too...
|
|
|
