Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Aga and rayburn cookers
DIY Si

posted on 19/8/07 at 05:16 PM Reply With Quote
Aga and rayburn cookers

Right following on from my church conversion stuff, I have another odd question.
I've been looking into heating the place, as this could be either a bit tricky, or just expensive. I've noticed that Agas and Rayburns can be used to provide hot water for both domestic use and for central heating. Could the water also be used for under floor heating, or would it be the wrong temperature?
Now then, does anyone know how this would stack up next to having a more normal central heating boiler and/or under floor heating? Is not having a hot water boiler/tank much of an advantage? I know these type of cookers/heaters are expensive, but it would be seen as a useful luxury in a period style kitchen, so initial expensive isn't too much of an issue. But just how high are the running costs for these, especially when compared to having a separate cooker and water heater?





“Let your plans be dark and as impenetratable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”
Sun Tzu, The Art of War

My new blog: http://spritecave.blogspot.co.uk/

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
tegwin

posted on 19/8/07 at 05:22 PM Reply With Quote
As I understand it things get complicated if you want to run underfloor heating with an AGA...

Underfloor heating wants a flow temp of 45 degrees..Im guessing the AGA is going to be chucking out somewhere around 60 degrees...

I guess you could run the AGA through a heat storage buffer tank and then draw off the water from that through a thermostatic mixing valve to the underfloor heating...

Something you should note is that, if you have an AGA heating water, it will be perminantly heating the water...you cant just stop it heating the water (apparently)....

And also, running an AGA to heat the water is proberably less efficiant then having a modern condensing boiler...

We have an AGA to cook on, but it doesnt heat the water...its such a nice thing to have keeping the back of the house warm and dry.....But its fooking expensive to run!!!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
DIY Si

posted on 19/8/07 at 05:37 PM Reply With Quote
If I read the Aga website right, the oil fired cookers are designed to be turned on and off, but as to whether that is all of it, or just the cookers I don't know. Also, some, but not all, of the new gas fired ones have a condensing boiler. Just to confuse things further!
If you don't mind me asking, what size and type of Aga do you have, and just how expensive is it to run? Only 1 of my mates parents has one, and they're not about at the mo for me to ask.





“Let your plans be dark and as impenetratable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”
Sun Tzu, The Art of War

My new blog: http://spritecave.blogspot.co.uk/

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
JoelP

posted on 19/8/07 at 06:12 PM Reply With Quote
i would guess from a simple thermodynamics point of view that a condensing boiler as required is more economical than an aga on perminantly. Fuel type isnt an issue since you can get oil fired boilers (i think, not my area really).

Rather than underfloor heating, you could lay insulation and put in a false floor 4" higher, since im guessing head room isnt an issue in a church!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
DIY Si

posted on 19/8/07 at 06:17 PM Reply With Quote
I was planning on redoing most of the floor anyway, so the plan was to fill the space currently under there with insulation when rebuilding. Just trying to think of ways to heat the place, and I quite like under floor stuff. Having said that, the bigger Agas can keep up to 16 radiators warm! I'm just not sure how effective they would be in such a tall space.





“Let your plans be dark and as impenetratable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”
Sun Tzu, The Art of War

My new blog: http://spritecave.blogspot.co.uk/

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
hughpinder

posted on 20/8/07 at 08:10 AM Reply With Quote
Hi
I'm using an oil fired rayburn 480K - combined cooker and 86000Btu boiler to heat a large 4 bed (old) house, without much in the way of insulation. I have a 200 l hot water tank with 2 coils in it - the boiler pumps into the main cylinder body, one coil is used to heat the hot water to the taps and the other is used for the central heating (for more info, it is an albion mainsflow tank). I use 2* 660 gallon tanks of oil per year (currently about £800 per fill). The efficiency of the boiler is about 85%, newer separate condensing type boiler boiler about 10% higher AFAIK. Also the Rayburn with cooker + heating is a much more expensive option to buy initially than buying a Rayburn to cook on and a separate boiler. Reliability of the range is not very good - I get it serviced twice per year at 80 to 250 per time and still get failures. I believe the reliability of the older 'wick' type ranges is good. It takes about 20 minutes for the rayburn to heat up for cooking, and not much use if you like stir fried food. Also the same burner heats the oven and hot plates, so when the oven reaches temperature your hot plates are not so hot to cook on.

Hope this helps
Hugh

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.