Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Handling & whatnot...
Metal Hippy™

posted on 24/1/02 at 03:18 AM Reply With Quote
Handling & whatnot...

I've posted a message in one of the other boards (don't remember which) regarding the chassis being basically of the width in the book and using a wider Capri axle.

I've been told this would cause a slight improvement in the handling (probably so slight that it's not noticable the way Joe Average drives, but hey..)

Any comments gratefully received.

Unless they're of an insulting nature about me, Capris or otherwise...

Rich.





President of the Non-conformist Locost Builders Club. E-mail for details...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
macdave69

posted on 24/1/02 at 04:02 PM Reply With Quote
Think this has been discussed elsewhere!
The response was extra width would give better handling and the arches would be filled out, however, the stance of the car woud change slightly as there would be a difference in track between front (narrow)and rear (wide), of course this could be addressed by lengthening the steering arms and wishbones or just ignored






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Metal Hippy™

posted on 24/1/02 at 10:48 PM Reply With Quote
You've sort of answered my question...

I suppose reALLY i WAS {oops, caps lock} searching for voices either disagreeing with the idea of a narrow track on the front and the wider track on the rear or indeed agreeing that it wouldn't do much harm while also making the handling better.

I'd seen the previous postings and thought I'd try for more info if anyone had any...

Rich.





President of the Non-conformist Locost Builders Club. E-mail for details...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
ChrisW

posted on 25/1/02 at 01:19 PM Reply With Quote
I'm no expert in car setup but I can't see there being a big problem with having slightly more track width at the back. If you are worried, use a different offset wheel so the centre lines of the front and back are in line.

I'm planning on going down the alternative route of using spacers to increase the track width enough to fill the rear arches (I've got a mk2 RS2000 axle) Personally I think it really ruins the look of a seven (or any car in fact) if you've got a huge space in your arches.

Chris

ChrisW

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Metal Hippy™

posted on 25/1/02 at 05:48 PM Reply With Quote
I've pretty much got the answer I was looking for. Well, the confirmation of what I'd been told. With the minimal weight of the Locost compared to the Capri, the weight distribution on the axle shouldn't be any problem.

The difference in the front and rear track isn't actually that big, a couple of inches either side. Actually I think that the smaller track at the front will give the car an ever so slightly more aggressive stance (in a subtle way), which with a bit of luck and a following wind will make it look even better....

As regards the rear arches, I agree with them looking a lot better filled, so the extra couple of inches either side that the Capri axle will provide added to the mint Laser alloys we have should make it look nice.

Cheers.

Rich.





President of the Non-conformist Locost Builders Club. E-mail for details...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.